Who was Melchizedek?

 

Melchizedek: Priest of the Most High God, Type of Christ, and Bridge Between Covenants

A Chicago-Style Academic Essay from a Catholic Perspective

By Chris M. Forte

---

Introduction

Few biblical figures exert an influence as profound as Melchizedek while remaining described in so few words. His sudden appearance in Genesis 14—blessing Abram and offering bread and wine—has inspired centuries of interpretation across Judaism, Christianity, and later apocalyptic traditions. As a Catholic, the more I have studied Melchizedek, the more I see in him a mysterious prefiguration of Christ Himself: a king of righteousness, a priest of the Most High God, and a symbol of the eternal priesthood in which the Catholic Church claims participation. His priestly offering foreshadows the Eucharist, his kingship recalls Christ’s royal identity, and his genealogical silence reflects a heavenly order the Letter to the Hebrews boldly identifies with Christ’s eternal priesthood.

This paper surveys Melchizedek’s portrayal in Scripture, Jewish tradition, Second Temple literature, early Christian writings, the Catholic theological tradition, and modern scholarship—while also integrating my own Catholic perspective, which sees in Melchizedek a powerful witness to the unity of Scripture, the continuity of priesthood, and the Eucharistic identity of the Church.

Abstract

This paper explores the biblical figure of Melchizedek across the full spectrum of ancient Jewish, Christian, and modern scholarly interpretation, with particular attention to his enduring significance in Catholic theology. Beginning with his brief yet theologically rich introduction in Genesis 14 and the royal-priestly declaration of Psalm 110, the study traces Melchizedek’s development in Second Temple Judaism—including his striking portrayal as a heavenly, eschatological liberator in 11QMelchizedek—and demonstrates how these traditions illuminate the Letter to the Hebrews’ claim that Christ is “a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek.” Early Christian writers consistently viewed Melchizedek as a type of Christ and a prefiguration of the Eucharistic offering of bread and wine, a theme later formalized in Catholic liturgy and doctrine. Drawing on patristic sources, Qumran texts, archaeological data, and contemporary biblical scholarship, I argue from my perspective as a Catholic that Melchizedek functions as a theological bridge linking the Old and New Covenants: a figure whose priesthood anticipates Christ’s eternal priesthood and whose offering foreshadows the Eucharist. Melchizedek thus stands as a luminous witness to the unity of Scripture and the sacramental identity of the Church.

---

I. Melchizedek in the Hebrew Bible

Genesis 14: Priest and King

Melchizedek’s first appearance is abrupt:

“And Melchizedek king of Salem brought out bread and wine; he was priest of God Most High” (Gen. 14:18).

The passage describes him performing three actions: offering bread and wine, blessing Abram, and receiving a tithe. His dual identity—king of Salem and priest of ’El Elyon—sets him apart in the narrative world of Genesis. Many scholars identify Salem with ancient Jerusalem based on Psalm 76:2.¹ The name “Melchizedek” is typically interpreted as “king of righteousness,” the city “Salem” as “peace.”²

In the Hebrew Bible, no genealogy is provided. This silence becomes crucial later in the theological imagination.

Psalm 110:4—A Royal Priesthood

Psalm 110 announces:

“You are a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek.”

In its original context, the psalm refers to the Davidic king, presenting him as possessing an older, more universal priesthood than the Aaronic line.³ As a Catholic, I recognize this psalm as a key hinge text: it connects a pre-Israelite priesthood with David, and through David, ultimately with Christ.

---

II. Melchizedek in Second Temple Judaism

Rabbinic Interpretations

Rabbinic Judaism—attempting to understand this enigmatic figure—often identifies Melchizedek with Shem, son of Noah.⁴ This identification explains his great age and monotheistic priesthood. Some rabbinic sources argue Melchizedek forfeited the priesthood because he blessed Abraham before blessing God.⁵ This tradition safeguards the primacy of the Aaronic priesthood and frames Melchizedek as righteous but surpassed.

Qumran and 11QMelchizedek

The most dramatic development appears in the Dead Sea Scrolls, especially 11QMelchizedek (11Q13). In this text, Melchizedek becomes:

• a heavenly eschatological figure,

• associated with atonement,

• a liberator who proclaims Jubilee,

• and even a conqueror of Belial (Satan).⁶

Some scholars identify him with the archangel Michael; others see him as a messianic high priest.⁷ As a Catholic reader, I find this fascinating—not because I accept Melchizedek as an angel, but because it shows the conceptual space in Judaism for a heavenly, eternal priesthood later fulfilled in Christ.

---

III. Melchizedek in the New Testament

The Letter to the Hebrews

Hebrews offers the most extensive Christian interpretation:

• Christ is “a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek” (Heb. 5:6; 6:20; 7:17).

• Melchizedek’s name (“king of righteousness”) and city (“peace”) prefigure Christ’s identity.⁸

• His genealogy is omitted so that he can resemble one who has “neither beginning of days nor end of life,” a literary depiction of eternal priesthood.⁹

The argument is clear: Christ fulfills—rather than replaces—the Melchizedekian priesthood, revealing its true meaning.

As a Catholic, this is crucial for understanding why Christ can be both king and priest without being a Levite, and why the Catholic priesthood is rooted not in bloodline but in Christ’s eternal priesthood.

---

IV. Melchizedek in Early Christianity

Patristic Interpretations

Early Christian writers unanimously read Melchizedek as a type of Christ:

• Origen saw him as symbolizing the divine Logos and the heavenly priesthood.¹⁰

• Ambrose linked Melchizedek’s bread and wine directly to the Eucharistic sacrifice.¹¹

• Clement of Alexandria emphasized Melchizedek’s role in revealing a universal priesthood prior to the Law.¹²

A few fringe groups (e.g., Melchizedekians) elevated Melchizedek above Christ; the Great Church condemned these movements as heretical.¹³

Melchizedek and the Eucharist

The Fathers consistently interpreted Melchizedek’s offering as a prefiguration of the Eucharist—a connection deeply embedded in Catholic liturgy. The Roman Canon explicitly references “the offering of your high priest Melchizedek.”

As a Catholic, I see this as profound: the earliest Eucharistic theology ties the Mass not merely to Passover but to the primordial priesthood that blessed Abraham.

---

V. Melchizedek in Catholic Theology

The Catechism

The Catechism of the Catholic Church affirms:

“The Church sees in the gesture of the king-priest Melchizedek, who ‘brought out bread and wine,’ a prefiguring of the Eucharist.”¹⁴

And regarding the priesthood:

“Christ is the source of all priesthood.”¹⁵

Catholic teaching therefore views Melchizedek as:

1. a real historical priest-king,

2. a typological foreshadowing of Christ,

3. the figure through whom Scripture explains Christ’s eternal priesthood,

4. and an anticipatory image of the Eucharistic sacrifice.

My Perspective as a Catholic

For me, Melchizedek embodies the deep unity of Scripture—the way the Old Testament points beyond itself. He is a reminder that God planted signs of the New Covenant long before Sinai or the Levites.

Melchizedek also helps me understand the Eucharist not simply as a ritual meal, but as the universal offering of bread and wine foreshadowed at history’s dawn. And he explains why Catholic priesthood is not reducible to Old Testament categories: it participates not in an earthly genealogy but in Christ’s eternal priesthood “according to the order of Melchizedek.”

---

VI. Archaeology and Historical Context

Archaeology has not identified an inscription naming Melchizedek, but it does support the broader picture:

• Ancient Jerusalem was ruled by royal priest-kings during the Late Bronze Age.¹⁶

• The title ’El Elyon (God Most High) corresponds to names used in pre-Israelite Canaanite religion and aligns with early monotheistic titles.¹⁷

Thus, Melchizedek fits the historical patterns of a pre-Israelite Jerusalemite priest-king who worshipped the High God and recognized Abram.

---

Conclusion

Melchizedek stands at the crossroads of biblical theology. He bridges Gentile and Jew, Abraham and David, priesthood and kingship, Old Covenant and New. In my Catholic understanding, his life and priesthood illuminate Christ’s identity as eternal high priest, the Eucharist as the true offering of bread and wine, and the Catholic priest’s sacramental participation in Christ’s heavenly ministry.

Melchizedek appears briefly—but like a flash of lightning, he illuminates the entire biblical landscape.

---

Footnotes

1. John Day, God’s Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 91.

2. William L. Lane, Hebrews 1–8 (Word Biblical Commentary 47A; Dallas: Word, 1991), 162.

3. Frank Moore Cross, “The Council of Yahweh in Second Isaiah,” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 12 (1953): 274–277.

4. Babylonian Talmud, Nedarim 32b.

5. Genesis Rabbah 43:6.

6. Florentino García Martínez and Eibert J. C. Tigchelaar, The Dead Sea Scrolls Study Edition, vol. 2 (Leiden: Brill, 1997), 1209–1213.

7. Geza Vermes, The Dead Sea Scrolls in English, 5th ed. (London: Penguin, 2011), 532–533.

8. Heb. 7:2; Lane, Hebrews, 165–166.

9. Harold W. Attridge, The Epistle to the Hebrews (Hermeneia; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1989), 189–195.

10. Origen, Homilies on Genesis, trans. Ronald Heine (Washington, D.C.: CUA Press, 1982), Hom. 16.

11. Ambrose, De Sacramentis 4.3.

12. Clement of Alexandria, Stromata 4.25.

13. Epiphanius, Panarion 55.

14. Catechism of the Catholic Church (1992), §1333.

15. Catechism, §1548.

16. Kathleen Kenyon, Jerusalem: Excavating 3000 Years of History (New York: McGraw Hill, 1967), 41–44.

17. Mark S. Smith, The Early History of God: Yahweh and the Other Deities in Ancient Israel (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002), 32–34.

---

Bibliography

Ambrose. De Sacramentis.
Attridge, Harold W. The Epistle to the Hebrews. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1989.
Clement of Alexandria. Stromata.
Cross, Frank Moore. “The Council of Yahweh in Second Isaiah.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 12 (1953): 274–277.
García Martínez, Florentino, and Eibert Tigchelaar. The Dead Sea Scrolls Study Edition. Leiden: Brill, 1997.
Kenyon, Kathleen. Jerusalem: Excavating 3000 Years of History. New York: McGraw Hill, 1967.
Lane, William L. Hebrews 1–8. Word Biblical Commentary 47A. Dallas: Word, 1991.
Origen. Homilies on Genesis. Washington, D.C.: CUA Press, 1982.
Smith, Mark S. The Early History of God. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002.
Talmud Bavli. Nedarim 32b.
Vermes, Geza. The Dead Sea Scrolls in English. London: Penguin, 2011.
*The Catechism of the Catholic Church. Vatican City, 1992.