A Catholic Perspective on the Israel–Palestine Conflict

 

Children of Abraham, Land of Tears

A Catholic Perspective on the Israel–Palestine Conflict

By Chris M. Forte

“Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called children of God.”
— Matthew 5:9

___________________________________________

 

I. Prologue: The Holy Land and the Holy War

There is a strip of land on the Mediterranean coast called many things: Canaan, Judea, Israel, Palestine—the Holy Land.

For Jews, it is the land of promise.
For Muslims, the land of the Prophet’s ascension.
For Christians, it is the land where God became flesh.

And yet today, it is a land of blood.
The Israel–Palestine conflict is not just a political standoff—it is a spiritual and humanitarian tragedy. This exposé explores the historical, theological, and moral dimensions of this crisis from a Catholic perspective.

---

II. The Children of Abraham: Isaac and Ishmael

“God heard the cry of the boy.” — Genesis 21:17

The conflict between Jews and Arabs is often traced—allegorically and historically—to the sons of Abraham:

• Isaac, through whom Jews trace their lineage,

• Ishmael, traditionally considered the forefather of the Arabs.

Though separated by blood and story, both are children of promise.

The Catholic Church affirms that both Jews and Muslims worship the one Creator:

“The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place among whom are the Muslims.”
— Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) §841

But only in Christ Jesus is the fullness of the covenant revealed, uniting Jew and Gentile, Isaac and Ishmael, into the New Israel—the Church.

---

III. From Rome to Jerusalem: Christianity’s Deep Roots

After Christ’s Resurrection, the Church took root in Jerusalem but was scattered following Roman persecution. Christianity spread to Antioch, then to Rome, evolving into a universal Church, no longer bound by land or ethnic bloodlines.

And yet, Christians never left the Holy Land.
To this day, Catholics of the Latin, Melkite, Maronite, and Armenian rites live and worship where Christ once walked.

But now, their future is in peril.

---

IV. The Zionist Movement and the Founding of Israel

After the Holocaust, the international community backed the idea of a Jewish homeland. In 1947, the UN proposed a partition of Palestine, with Jerusalem under international governance.

Israel declared statehood in 1948. War erupted.
Palestinians were expelled or fled—700,000 in total. Christians among them.

The Nakba (“catastrophe”) remains a bitter memory for Palestinians, including Palestinian Christians.

“Peace requires justice. Justice requires truth. Truth demands memory.”

---

V. The Church’s Teaching: Not Partisanship—But Prophecy

The Vatican recognizes both Israel and Palestine, and calls for:

• A negotiated two-state solution,

• Full access to holy sites,

• The end of occupation and violence on both sides.

The Church does not support violence—whether from Hamas or the IDF. It supports human dignity and the presence of Christians in their homeland.

“No one is saved alone, as an isolated individual. Rather... we are saved together.”
— Pope Francis, Fratelli Tutti

---

VI. Dispensationalism: A Protestant Error

Many American Evangelicals support Israel due to dispensationalist eschatology:

• The belief that Israel is the fulfillment of prophecy,

• That the Third Temple must be rebuilt,

• That Christ will return after Jewish suffering in the End Times.

This view is rejected by the Catholic Church.
The Church teaches:

• Christ is the New Temple (John 2:19),

• The Church is the New Israel (Galatians 6:16),

• All prophecy is fulfilled in Christ.

“The old covenant has been fulfilled in the New Covenant.”
— CCC §121–123

Dispensationalism politicizes theology and reduces salvation history to land ownership—a far cry from the universal Kingdom of God.

---

VII. The Suffering of Palestinian Christians

Today, Palestinian Christians are vanishing.
In Gaza, there are fewer than 1,000 left.
The Holy Family Catholic Church was bombed in 2025, killing worshippers.
The Greek Orthodox Church of Saint Porphyrius was also bombed.
In the West Bank, Christian towns face attacks from Jewish settlers with near-total impunity.

“We are forgotten by the world, and sometimes even by the Church.”
— Fr. Gabriel Romanelli, Holy Family Church, Gaza

Though targeted by no one and protected by no one, these Christians endure with faith and charity. Their schools educate Muslims and Christians alike. Their hospitals heal all.

---

VIII. Final Word: The Cross, Not the Flag

As a Catholic, I believe:

• Israel is a nation, not a theological symbol.

• It is important as the land of the Incarnation, but its government must be held to moral scrutiny like any other.

• Criticizing a government is not antisemitism.

• When Jewish settlers burn churches, and the State does nothing, that silence is complicity.

Our loyalty is not to nationalism, but to Christ crucified.
We must speak truth even when it is unpopular.
We must remember that Christians are dying where Christianity began.

---

Appendix: Sources and Resources

1. Catechism of the Catholic Church §121–123, §841, §877 – Vatican.va

2. Pope Francis, Fratelli Tutti – Vatican.va

3. Church Bombings in Gaza (2025) – AP News

4. History of Dispensationalism – Catholic Answers

5. UN Partition Plan (1947) – UN Archives

6. Holy Family Church, Gaza – Wikipedia

7. Patriarch Pizzaballa on Gaza – Reuters

8. History of the Nakba – Al Jazeera

9. Settlement Violence Against Christians – Times of Israel

Recent Developments: New Outcries for Humanity

Tragedy at Gaza’s Only Catholic Church

• On 17 July 2025, Israeli tank fire hit the Holy Family Church in Gaza, killing three and injuring ten, including Fr. Gabriel Romanelli. The attack came amid wider strikes on Gaza and intensifying starvation. Israel called it an accident; Cardinal Pizzaballa challenged that assertion Wikipedia+11Axios+11Vatican News+11The Washington Post+2Wikipedia+2TIME+2.

Pope Leo XIV Responds

• In his Angelus address at Castel Gandolfo, Pope Leo mourned the victims—Saad Salameh, Foumia Ayyad, Najwa Abu Daoud—calling for an immediate ceasefire, protection for worship spaces, and adherence to international law USCCB+3AP News+3Vatican News+3.

• The Vatican reiterated: “The world can't take it anymore… protect civilians… end the barbarity of war” The Times of India+15USCCB+15AP News+15.

U.S. Reaction

• Former President Donald Trump, reflecting widespread unease, personally pressured PM Netanyahu to explain and account for the attack Axios.

• The Trump administration publicly expressed frustration with Israel's continued military actions in Gaza and Syria, warning of potential strains on U.S.–Israel relations The Times of India+4TIME+4The Times+4.

International and Humanitarian Crisis

• A 32-nation Bogotá summit called Israel’s Gaza campaign a genocide and proposed halting arms supplies and raising accountability Wikipedia.

• UN aid agencies called Gaza a “hell on earth” amid intensifying starvation; dozens—many children—have died seeking food The Scottish Sun+4Al Jazeera+4The Guardian+4.

---

The Plight of Palestinian Christians

Between Israeli airstrikes in Gaza and settler violence in the West Bank, Christian communities are vanishing. The recent church strike and broader military operations in Jenin, Tulkarm, and elsewhere highlight a trend: religious persecution masked as collateral damage.

Fr. Romanelli voiced the anguish of many:

“We are forgotten by the world, and sometimes even by the Church.”

 

Appendix: Sources & Further Reading

1. AP News, “Pope Leo XIV renews call for ceasefire in Gaza” WikipediaWikipedia+3The Washington Post+3Vatican News+3Wikipedia+11Axios+11AP News+11

2. Vatican News, “Pope appeals for end to Gaza ‘barbarity’” TIME+15Vatican News+15USCCB+15

3. Time, “How Israel Appears to Be Gambling With Trump’s Patience” TIME

4. The Bogotá Summit, Hague Group report The Times+5Wikipedia+5unrwa.org+5

5. UN & Aid reports on Gaza humanitarian crisis unrwa.org+1The Guardian+1

6. Wikipedia & Reuters: Holy Family Church bombing AP News+7Wikipedia+7Axios+7

7. Catechism references and Pope Francis’s Fratelli Tutti Wikipedia

About the Author

Chris M. Forte is a Catholic writer, historian, and editor based in San Diego’s Little Italy. With a deep passion for theology, Church history, and global justice, he explores the intersection of faith, politics, and human dignity through a Catholic lens. Drawing on years of research and lived experience, Chris writes to give voice to the voiceless and shed light on forgotten corners of the Catholic world.

Catholics & Zionism

The Catholic Church, Zionism, and the Modern State of Israel: Theology, Politics, and Conscience

The relationship between the Catholic Church, the modern State of Israel, and Zionism is one marked by deep theological reflection, historical trauma, political caution, and ecumenical outreach. In this article, I will examine the Church's evolving views on these matters and offer a perspective grounded in historical reality, theological clarity, and moral responsibility.

---

I. Israel: Biblical Nation vs. Modern State

The modern State of Israel, established in 1948, is not a theological continuation of the biblical kingdom of Israel. As Catholic theologian Fr. Edward Flannery wrote in The Anguish of the Jews, "The modern political state is not identical with the covenantal people of the Old Testament." The Catechism of the Catholic Church affirms that the Jewish people remain in covenant with God (CCC 839), but this does not extend to any national or territorial entitlement grounded in Scripture.

Cardinal Ratzinger (later Pope Benedict XVI) echoed this in Many Religions, One Covenant: "The promise of the land was never an unqualified political title to territory but was part of a theological framework—ultimately fulfilled not in a political geography but in the coming of the Messiah."

Thus, the modern Israeli state is a political entity like any other. It has the right to exist as a nation among nations, but it should not be imbued with religious or eschatological significance. This is not only a Catholic view but is shared by some Orthodox Jewish communities (e.g., Neturei Karta), who reject Zionism as a secular nationalist movement.

---

II. Zionism: A Political Movement, Not a Theological Doctrine

Zionism, as articulated by Theodor Herzl and others, was a nationalist movement to establish a Jewish homeland in Palestine. It emerged in the 19th century as a response to European antisemitism and persecution. While understandable in its historical context, Zionism is a political ideology, not a theological truth.

Pope Pius XII, despite criticisms of his wartime silence, supported humanitarian aid to Holocaust survivors but was cautious about Zionism. His successors have maintained a careful distinction between recognizing the State of Israel and endorsing Zionism as a religious or messianic project.

The Holy See formally recognized Israel in 1993, but the Fundamental Agreement clarified that this recognition is political, not theological. The Vatican does not equate Israel’s existence with fulfillment of biblical prophecy.

Unfortunately, many political leaders around the world today—particularly in the United States—are strongly influenced by Protestant dispensationalism, a theology that views the modern state of Israel as key to triggering the End Times. This view is not confined to Protestants; even some Catholic politicians and laypeople, perhaps unwittingly, echo these eschatological frameworks. I believe that many of these individuals are not genuinely concerned with the dignity and well-being of the peoples in the Middle East, including Jews, Christians, and Muslims. Instead, they are driven by a warped biblical lens that sees violence, war, and instability as necessary preludes to Armageddon and Christ’s Second Coming.

This is a disturbing and dangerous worldview. It turns the Holy Land into a chessboard for apocalyptic fantasy. The idea that provoking a world war in the Middle East will somehow accelerate divine prophecy is not only morally abhorrent but also spiritually corrupt. As a side note, it is worth clarifying that the Catholic Church officially refutes dispensationalism. It has never been part of Catholic teaching, and though some Catholics have been exposed to it through Protestant influence, it stands in direct contradiction to the Church’s understanding of biblical prophecy and salvation history.

Catholic theology holds that Christ has already inaugurated the final age through His death and resurrection, and the Church, not a nation-state, is the true Israel journeying toward fulfillment.

---

III. The Church and the Jewish People

The Second Vatican Council’s Nostra Aetate (1965) was a milestone in Catholic-Jewish relations. It states:

"The Church, therefore, exhorts her sons and daughters, that, recognizing the patrimony common to Christians and Jews, they strive to further mutual understanding and respect..."

The Church rejects antisemitism and acknowledges the irrevocable nature of God's covenant with the Jewish people (Romans 11:29). Yet, it stops short of saying that Judaism, as it stands today, fulfills the full revelation of God, which the Church believes is realized in Jesus Christ (CCC 840).

---

IV. Israel and the Rights of All Peoples

While Israel has the right to exist and ensure the safety of its citizens, the designation of Israel as a "Jewish State" raises theological and ethical concerns. Christians have lived in the Holy Land since Pentecost (Acts 2), and the region is also home to Muslims, Druze, Baha’is, and others.

Human rights, equal citizenship, and religious freedom must be guaranteed to all people, not just Jews. Pope Francis has reiterated the Church’s support for a two-state solution and for the rights of Palestinians, including Christians who often suffer under occupation and legal inequalities.

The Jerusalem Declaration of 2006 by Palestinian Christian leaders—Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant—rejected Christian Zionism as a distortion of the Gospel and called for justice for all inhabitants of the land.

---

V. A Personal View: A Dream of a Catholic Kingdom

As a Catholic, I believe that while Israel must exist as a political state with secure borders and equal rights for all, it should not claim to be a religious state exclusive to Jews. The land is sacred to all three Abrahamic faiths, and any national identity imposed upon it should reflect justice, inclusion, and peace.

It is, perhaps, only a dream—but I long to see the land that once saw the footsteps of Christ, the apostles, and the early Church restored as a Christian land. A Catholic Kingdom—governed by Christ’s law, radiating the light of the Gospel from Jerusalem—may never happen in this age, but as St. Augustine reminds us in The City of God, our true citizenship is in heaven.

Until then, we must work for peace, justice, and truth on earth, without conflating modern politics with divine destiny.

---

VI. Jews in the End Times and the Temple Question

The Catholic Church does not endorse any rebuilding of a third Jewish temple in Jerusalem or the resumption of Old Testament animal sacrifices. In fact, such efforts are seen as theologically obsolete, given that Christ has fulfilled the Law.

The Letter to the Hebrews is clear:

“We have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all... Where there is forgiveness of these, there is no longer any offering for sin.” (Hebrews 10:10,18)

The Church teaches that Jesus Christ is the new and eternal High Priest, and His sacrifice on the cross was the once-and-for-all atonement. There is no more need for temple sacrifices. As the Catechism states:

“Christ's sacrifice is unique; it completes and surpasses all other sacrifices.” (CCC 614)

The Church is also the fulfillment of Israel, not a replacement, but a continuation and transformation through Christ. The new covenant redefines God's people not by ethnicity or geography, but by faith in Christ and sacramental communion.

As for the Temple, I share the personal belief that the true Third Temple is Jesus Himself, as He said:

“Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.” (John 2:19)

He was speaking of His Body, and by extension, His Mystical Body—the Church.

From this theological lens, St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome, which houses the tomb of the Apostle Peter and serves as the heart of global Catholic worship, can be seen as the visible Temple of the new covenant. It stands not just as a building, but as a symbol of the Church’s universal mission and Christ’s kingship.

Though this vision is spiritual, it carries political and moral implications: the world must stop looking to stones and altars of the past and turn to the living temple—Christ—and His Church.

---

Sources Cited:

• Catechism of the Catholic Church, sections 614, 839–840

• Nostra Aetate, Vatican II

• Many Religions, One Covenant, Joseph Ratzinger

• The Anguish of the Jews, Edward Flannery

• The City of God, St. Augustine

• Holy See-Israel Fundamental Agreement (1993)

• Jerusalem Declaration on Christian Zionism (2006)

• Public speeches by Popes John Paul II, Benedict XVI, and Francis

• Acts 2; Romans 11:29; Hebrews 10; John 2:19