Why I Am Catholic: Catholic Pope vs. Evangelical/Non-denominational Pastor

 This Is Another Reason I Am Catholic: Real Authority, Apostolic Succession, and the Limits of Evangelical Leadership

This is another reason I am Catholic: because I believe that if God truly established one Church to carry His authority on Earth, it wouldn’t be invisible, fractured, or improvised. It would be visible, unified, and divinely structured. That Church would speak with clarity. It would have global reach. It would still be standing after 2,000 years.

And it does. It’s the Catholic Church.

The Pope is not just a religious leader. He is the successor of Saint Peter, appointed by Christ to lead the Church: “You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church” (Matthew 16:18). He occupies the most enduring office in human history. His authority isn’t invented—it’s inherited through Apostolic Succession. That alone sets the Catholic Church apart from every denomination and independent ministry in the world.

By contrast, Evangelical and non-denominational pastors operate outside of that divine framework. They may have strong preaching, emotional worship, and authentic zeal—but they lack what matters most: legitimate spiritual authority passed down from the apostles themselves.

The Pope vs. the Pastor: One Rules from Apostolic Legacy, the Other from Charisma

Being Pope is like being the President of a global spiritual nation. You surrender your personal life. You don’t decide where you live, what you eat, or where you go. Everything is provided for you, but at the cost of total self-sacrifice. You are no longer just a man—you are the visible head of Christ’s Church on Earth.

The Vatican is a sovereign state. The Pope addresses heads of state, issues encyclicals that shape global ethics, and speaks to 1.3 billion Catholics. He has real influence—not through politics or wealth, but through apostolic authority. When he speaks on faith and morals in communion with the bishops, the Church listens—and the world often pays attention.

In sharp contrast, most Evangelical and non-denominational pastors serve in obscurity. Their influence is usually limited to a local congregation. They are not part of any historical chain of leadership. They have no institutional structure behind them, no global body in communion, no magisterium, no shared creed, no sacraments instituted by Christ flowing through Apostolic hands.

Most are self-appointed or congregation-appointed. Their “ordination” is not sacramental, nor is it linked to the original Church Christ founded. They can start a new church anytime, anywhere, with no authority but their own sense of calling. As Protestant theologian Carl Trueman once admitted:

“Evangelicalism, especially in its independent and non-denominational forms, has no center of gravity... It runs on personality and platform, not office.”
(First Things, 2021)

Apostolic Succession: The Unbroken Chain

One of the clearest marks of the true Church is Apostolic Succession—the unbroken line of bishops from the apostles to today. As St. Irenaeus wrote in the 2nd century:

“It is possible, then, for everyone in every church, who may wish to know the truth, to contemplate the tradition of the apostles... which has been made known throughout the whole world.”
(Against Heresies, Book III)

Evangelical churches don’t just lack succession—they often reject it altogether. Their teachings are derived from private interpretation of Scripture, not the living Tradition passed down from the apostles. Their ministries arise from movements or reactions, not divine commission through the Church Christ instituted.

That’s why the Catechism of the Catholic Church says clearly:

“The sole Church of Christ... subsists in the Catholic Church, which is governed by the successor of Peter and by the bishops in communion with him.”
(CCC 816)

This isn’t arrogance—it’s clarity. Unity and authority are not optional extras; they are marks of the Church.

Sacraments and Spiritual Power

Catholic priests don’t just preach—they act in persona Christi. Through ordination, their souls are permanently configured to Christ. They don’t merely symbolize forgiveness or communion; they bring it about through the sacraments.

Evangelical pastors can preach the Gospel, but they cannot absolve sins in confession (John 20:23), or consecrate the Eucharist (Luke 22:19), or anoint the sick sacramentally (James 5:14–15). They cannot administer true sacraments because they do not possess apostolic orders. Their ministry is spiritual in intention, but disconnected from the supernatural graces Christ entrusted to His Church.

The sacraments are not optional rituals—they are the ordinary means God gives us for salvation. Without them, Christianity becomes a well-meant philosophy rather than a supernatural encounter.

Unity vs. Division

Jesus prayed “that they may all be one” (John 17:21). He didn’t found thousands of loosely affiliated ministries competing for followers. The Catholic Church is one, holy, catholic, and apostolic—not in theory, but in visible reality.

Evangelicalism is marked by fragmentation. There are over 30,000 Protestant denominations. Even within Evangelical circles, churches split constantly over doctrine, music style, leadership preferences, or cultural issues. Truth becomes negotiable. Authority becomes local. Unity becomes impossible.

But the Church Christ founded is not divided. It is one body with one head.

---

Final Word: Why I Am Catholic

This is another reason I am Catholic: because Christ didn’t leave us a book and walk away. He established a Church. A visible, authoritative, sacramental Church—built on Peter, governed by the apostles and their successors, and sustained by the Holy Spirit.

The Pope sits in the chair of Peter. The bishops follow the line of the apostles. The sacraments flow from Christ Himself. This isn’t man-made authority—it is divinely conferred.

No other Church has this.

No other pastor has this.

No other voice speaks for God with the authority Christ gave to His Church.

And that’s why I will remain Catholic.

Why the Catholic Church Says the Church—Not Scripture Alone—is the Final Authority

Why the Catholic Church Says the Church—Not Scripture Alone—is the Final Authority

One of the deepest divides between Catholics and Protestants is this: Where does the authority to teach and interpret the Christian faith ultimately rest? Protestants argue for sola Scriptura—that the Bible alone is sufficient. The Catholic Church, on the other hand, teaches that Christ established a living, teaching Church to guard and interpret both Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition.

So, who did Jesus leave in charge—the book, or the Church?

---

The Catholic View: A Living Church Guards the Faith

The Catholic Church teaches that the Word of God comes to us in two forms: Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition, both of which are entrusted to the Church to interpret faithfully through the Magisterium, its teaching office.

“Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture make up a single sacred deposit of the Word of God… entrusted to the Church.”¹

“The task of interpreting the Word of God authentically has been entrusted solely to the Magisterium of the Church.”²

This means the Church isn’t above the Bible—it’s the servant of the Word, ensuring it’s passed on without distortion.

---

Scripture Supports Church Authority

While sola Scriptura advocates often cite 2 Timothy 3:16—“All Scripture is inspired by God…”—that verse never says only Scripture is the rule of faith. The Bible itself shows the early Church relying on oral tradition and authoritative interpretation.

“So then, brothers, stand firm and hold to the traditions that you were taught by us, either by our spoken word or by our letter.” (2 Thessalonians 2:15)

“How can I [understand] unless someone guides me?” (Acts 8:31)

Jesus established a visible, teaching Church—not just a book:

“Whoever listens to you listens to me.” (Luke 10:16)
“You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church… I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 16:18–19)

---

What the Early Church Fathers Believed

The earliest Christians believed that the authority to teach and interpret the faith was handed down through apostolic succession—not individual reading of the Bible.

St. Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 180 AD), writing against heretics who twisted Scripture, said:

“When, however, they are refuted from the Scriptures, they turn round and accuse the Scriptures… But when we refer them to that tradition which originates from the apostles, and which is preserved by the successions of presbyters in the Churches, they object to tradition… It is within the power of all… to contemplate clearly the tradition of the apostles manifested throughout the whole world.”³

Tertullian (c. 200 AD) asked: who has the right to interpret Scripture?

“If there be any heresies which are bold enough to plant themselves in the midst of the apostolic age… let them show the origins of their churches, let them unroll the list of their bishops, coming down in due succession from the beginning… for the truth is that which is one with the apostles, which is not different from them in doctrine.”⁴

Origen (c. 250 AD), known for his Scripture expertise, emphasized that not just anyone could interpret Scripture rightly:

“Now that there are many who think they believe what the Scriptures teach, and some of them are of different opinions… heresies have come into existence… The Church received from the apostles the tradition of faith, and that faith was handed down in the succession of bishops.”⁵

St. Athanasius (4th century), who defended the divinity of Christ against the Arians, emphasized the authority of the Church’s tradition:

“Let us look at the very tradition, teaching, and faith of the Catholic Church from the beginning, which the Lord gave, the Apostles preached, and the Fathers preserved. Upon this the Church is founded.”⁶

---

Vatican II: Scripture, Tradition, and the Teaching Church

The Second Vatican Council summarized the traditional Catholic position clearly:

“It is clear… that sacred tradition, Sacred Scripture and the teaching authority of the Church… are so linked… that one cannot stand without the others.”⁷

You can’t pull the Bible out of its historical context and expect unity. Without the Church, even Scripture becomes vulnerable to contradiction and confusion.

---

The Protestant View: Sola Scriptura and Personal Interpretation

Martin Luther launched the Protestant Reformation with the idea that Scripture alone is the sole authority, and every believer can interpret it:

“A simple layman armed with Scripture is to be believed above a pope or a council without it.”⁸

This idea—sola Scriptura—was based on the belief that the Bible is clear enough to interpret without an official teacher or Church.

---

Why the Catholic Church Rejects Sola Scriptura

1. Scripture Doesn’t Teach It
   There’s no verse that says the Bible alone is the only authority. On the contrary, it teaches the importance of oral tradition and apostolic authority.

2. The Bible Came From the Church
   The canon of Scripture wasn’t finalized until the 4th century by the authority of the Catholic Church.⁹ The Bible didn’t fall from the sky—it was discerned, preserved, and passed on by bishops and councils.

3. Private Interpretation Leads to Chaos
   Since the Reformation, sola Scriptura has resulted in more than 30,000 denominations, many of them contradicting each other on core doctrines. That’s not the unity Christ prayed for (John 17:21).

4. Even Luther Saw the Danger
   Luther later admitted the chaos that his teaching caused:

   “There are almost as many sects and beliefs as there are heads… No peasant is so rude but that, if he dreams or fancies anything, it must be the Holy Spirit who inspires him.”¹⁰

---

Pope Benedict XVI: Scripture Needs the Church

“Scripture needs to be read and interpreted through the living Tradition of the Church… Without the Church, Scripture is just a book, open to anyone’s interpretation.”¹¹

The Church is not above the Word of God. But without the Church, the Word becomes fragmented and misused.

___________

Final Thought

The Bible is the inspired Word of God. But Jesus didn’t leave us a book and tell everyone to figure it out on their own. He established a visible Church, built on the apostles, with real teaching authority to guard and interpret His Word across generations.

That Church still exists today—and it’s the Catholic Church.

This is why I agree with and am a member of the Catholic Church—the one and only Church founded by Christ upon Peter and the Apostles. It’s not just historically rooted; it’s doctrinally consistent, biblically grounded, and spiritually alive. It is the Church that preserved the Bible, stood firm through heresies, councils, and empires, and continues to teach the full faith of the apostles.

In a world full of opinions and divisions, I choose the Church that speaks with Christ’s authority—not because I trust men, but because I trust the promise Jesus made:

“The gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” (Matthew 16:18)

---

Footnotes

1. Catechism of the Catholic Church, §97

2. CCC, §100

3. Irenaeus, Against Heresies, Book 3, Chapter 2–3

4. Tertullian, Prescription Against Heretics, Chapter 32

5. Origen, On First Principles, Preface, Book I

6. Athanasius, Four Letters to Serapion of Thmuis, 1:28

7. Vatican II, Dei Verbum, §10

8. Martin Luther, To the Christian Nobility of the German Nation (1520)

9. Council of Rome (382 AD), Synod of Hippo (393), Council of Carthage (397)

10. Martin Luther, On the Misuse of the Mass (1526)

11. Pope Benedict XVI, Jesus of Nazareth (2007)

---

Scripture Came From the Church, Not the Other Way Around

Jesus never told anyone to write a book.

He didn’t say, “Blessed are you, Simon bar Jonah—now go write a book, and upon that book I will build my Church. I will give that book the keys to the kingdom of heaven, and whatever that book binds on Earth will be bound in heaven.”

He said:

“You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church… I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven…” (Matthew 16:18–19)

Jesus built a Church, not a book. He didn’t write anything Himself—except once in the dirt (John 8:6). He taught by speaking and by forming a community around the apostles, who passed His teaching on orally, as they were commanded to do (Matthew 28:19–20).

When the apostles went out to evangelize the world, they didn’t carry a Bible under their arms. There was no New Testament yet. What they carried was the Gospel they had heard, seen, and touched (1 John 1:1–3). They preached, baptized, appointed bishops, and celebrated the Eucharist.

Only when disputes arose, or clarity was needed, did they write letters. Those letters—Paul to the Romans, Peter to the churches of Asia, John to his beloved children—were written to already-existing churches that had been living the faith without any New Testament writings at all.

So what did those early Christians rely on before they had any written Scripture?

They relied on Sacred Tradition—the teaching handed down from the apostles—and on the leadership of the bishops, who were appointed to preserve that tradition. St. Paul told the Thessalonians:

“Stand firm and hold fast to the traditions you were taught, either by our spoken word or by our letter.” (2 Thessalonians 2:15)

In fact, many Christian communities didn’t have access to the full New Testament until centuries later. What sustained them? The liturgy. The Eucharist. The rule of faith. The guidance of their bishop. And the unity of the Church that Christ had established.

The Church didn’t grow out of the Bible. The Bible grew out of the Church.

That’s why the early Church Fathers, over and over, insisted that the faith was preserved not in private interpretation, but in the continuity of apostolic teaching:

“Suppose there arise a dispute concerning some important question. Should we not have recourse to the most ancient Churches, with which the apostles held constant intercourse, and learn from them what is certain and clear in regard to the present question?”
— Tertullian, Prescription Against Heretics, 21

That’s the opposite of sola Scriptura. That’s the Church—the one Christ founded, the one guided by the Holy Spirit, the one that compiled the Scriptures, and the one that still teaches with authority today.

How Should a Catholic Answer: "Are You Going to Heaven?"

 

If you're Catholic and a Protestant or Evangelical street preacher asks, “If you were to die today and stood before a holy and righteous God who asked why He should let you into Heaven, what would be your answer?”—how should you respond?

This is a common tactic they use. They often follow it up with their version of the Gospel, which they believe is the whole truth: “Just have faith in Christ, say the sinner’s prayer, and accept Him into your heart—then you’re guaranteed Heaven, now and forever.”

But as Catholics, we know that this is an incomplete and oversimplified version of salvation. Faith in Christ is essential, but salvation is more than just a one-time decision—it’s a lifelong journey of faith, repentance, and obedience.

So, how should you answer?

A good Catholic response would be:

"I trust in God’s mercy and love, and I have great hope in my salvation. If I were to die today, my eternal destiny would ultimately rest in God’s just and merciful hands. If I am aware of mortal sin, I know I need Confession, but I also trust that if I die before I can go, God knows the sincerity of my repentance. And if I need purification, I trust in the mercy of Purgatory rather than assuming I would be condemned to Hell."

At this point, the preacher would likely argue that Purgatory doesn’t exist and that we don’t need to confess our sins to a priest. But that’s because he doesn’t fully understand Scripture or the true, complete Gospel.

Purgatory in Scripture and Jewish Tradition

The concept of purification after death is deeply rooted in both Scripture and Jewish tradition, which Christianity inherits. Before Christ, the Jewish people already believed in a process of purification for the dead.

📖 2 Maccabees 12:44-46 – "For if he were not expecting that those who had fallen would rise again, it would have been superfluous and foolish to pray for the dead... Thus he made atonement for the dead, so that they might be absolved from their sin."

This passage shows that Jewish belief included prayers and sacrifices for the dead, implying a state where purification was possible. Though Protestants reject Maccabees, it was part of the Septuagint, the Greek Old Testament used by Jesus and the Apostles.

Jesus also alludes to a temporary state of punishment and purification in the afterlife:

📖 Matthew 12:32 – “Whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.”

This implies that some sins can be forgiven after death, which makes sense only if a temporary purification exists—Purgatory.

📖 1 Corinthians 3:13-15 – “Each man’s work will become manifest; for the Day will disclose it... If any man’s work is burned up, he will suffer loss, though he himself will be saved, but only as through fire.”

This describes a purification process after death, where a person is saved, but not without suffering through a refining fire. This fits the Catholic understanding of Purgatory.

📖 Revelation 21:27 – “Nothing unclean shall enter [Heaven], but only those who are written in the Lamb’s book of life.”

Since no impurity can enter Heaven, there must be some process of purification for those who die in God’s grace but still have venial sins or attachments to sin.

📖 Matthew 5:25-26 – “Settle matters quickly with your adversary who is taking you to court. Do it while you are still together on the way, or your adversary may hand you over to the judge, and the judge may hand you over to the officer, and you may be thrown into prison. Truly I tell you, you will not get out until you have paid the last penny.”

Many Church Fathers interpreted this as an allusion to a temporary state of punishment before entering Heaven.

Confession to a Priest in the Bible

Many Protestants claim that we should confess our sins directly to God, but Jesus Himself established the Sacrament of Confession and gave authority to His Apostles to forgive sins in His name.

📖 John 20:21-23 – “Jesus said to them again, ‘Peace be with you. As the Father has sent Me, even so I send you.’ And when He had said this, He breathed on them and said, ‘Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven; if you withhold forgiveness from any, it is withheld.’”

Here, Jesus directly gives His Apostles the authority to forgive sins. If Christians were only supposed to confess directly to God, why would Jesus establish this special authority?

📖 James 5:16 – “Therefore, confess your sins to one another and pray for one another, that you may be healed.”

This verse supports verbal confession of sins, not just private prayer. In the early Church, confession was often public, but over time, the practice became private through a priest as Christ’s representative.

📖 2 Corinthians 5:18 – “All this is from God, who through Christ reconciled us to Himself and gave us the ministry of reconciliation.”

This passage speaks of a ministry of reconciliation, which refers to the priesthood continuing Christ’s work of forgiving sins.

📖 Leviticus 5:5-6 – “When a man is guilty in any of these, he shall confess the sin he has committed, and he shall bring his guilt offering to the Lord for the sin he has committed.”

In the Old Testament, confession of sins was not only personal but also involved a priest who made atonement through sacrifice. Jesus, fulfilling the law, gave His priests authority to reconcile sinners to God.

📖 Acts 19:18 – “Many of those who believed now came and openly confessed what they had done.”

The early Christians practiced public confession of sins, showing that confession was a normal part of Christian life.

The Full Gospel of Salvation

Accepting Jesus as Lord and believing in His sacrifice is only the beginning. The full Gospel includes:

✔️ Faith in Jesus Christ (John 3:16)
✔️ Repentance of sins (Luke 13:3, Acts 3:19)
✔️ Baptism for the forgiveness of sins (Mark 16:16, Acts 2:38)
✔️ Living a life of good works and obedience (James 2:24, Matthew 7:21)
✔️ Receiving the Sacraments, including Confession (John 20:22-23, 2 Corinthians 5:18)
✔️ Persevering in faith until the end (Matthew 24:13, Revelation 2:10)

Yes, I have accepted Jesus as my Lord and Savior. Yes, I believe in what He did on the cross. But I also recognize my human weakness. I don’t always live as Christ calls me to. That’s why Jesus provided a way for us to be reconciled whenever we fall—through Confession (John 20:22-23).

That’s the Catholic answer to the street preacher’s question:

"If I sincerely repent of my sins, go to Confession, and strive to follow Christ, I trust in His mercy and the promise of Heaven."

Even after Confession, I may still struggle with sin—but thank God that His mercy is limitless, and He allows us to seek forgiveness as often as we need.

That is the hope, peace, and assurance of the Catholic faith—not false confidence in a one-time moment, but a living relationship with Christ, strengthened through faith, repentance, and the sacraments.

Even demons—fallen angels—believe in Christ and know exactly what He did on the cross. But belief alone does not save them because, despite their full knowledge of God, they knowingly and permanently rejected Him. Unlike them, we as humans are given the gift of free will and the opportunity for redemption.

No matter how many times we sin, fall, or turn away from God, His mercy is always available to us—if we sincerely repent and seek His forgiveness. Simply believing in Jesus is just the beginning of salvation; living a faithful life, persevering in grace, and continually seeking holiness is what fulfills it.

Is Salvation by Faith Alone? What Does Faith in Christ Really Look Like?

---

Is Salvation by Faith Alone? What Does Faith in Christ Really Look Like?

Many Protestants and Evangelicals claim that salvation comes through faith in Christ alone—that Jesus did all the work on the Cross, and all we need to do is believe. The common teaching is that if you say the Sinner’s Prayer and accept Jesus as your Lord and Savior, you are instantly and permanently saved.

But this raises important questions:

1. If Christ’s finished work on the Cross is all that’s needed, why isn’t salvation automatically applied to everyone?

2. What does faith in Christ actually look like? Is it just saying one prayer and moving on?

3. How should the life of someone who has truly placed their faith in Christ look after their conversion?

If Christ's Atonement is Complete, Why Isn’t Everyone Saved Automatically?

Jesus’ sacrifice on the Cross was perfect and sufficient to atone for the sins of all humanity (1 John 2:2), but God still requires our free response. Salvation is not forced upon anyone—it requires an act of faith, repentance, and cooperation with God’s grace.

This is why Scripture repeatedly calls people to believe, repent, and follow Christ:

• John 3:16 – “Whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life.”

• Acts 2:38 – “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins.”

• James 2:24 – “You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone.”

God’s grace is freely given, but He does not override our free will. He invites, but He does not force. This is why salvation requires more than just Christ’s atonement—it requires our personal response and ongoing faithfulness.

What Does Faith in Christ Actually Look Like?

Faith is more than just intellectual belief or saying a one-time prayer. In the Bible, faith is an active, living trust in God that results in a transformed life.

Consider Jesus’ own words:

• Luke 9:23 – “If anyone would come after Me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow Me.”

• Matthew 7:21 – “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of My Father.”

True faith involves a lifelong relationship with Christ—trusting Him, obeying Him, and persevering in His grace. Simply saying the Sinner’s Prayer without ongoing commitment is not what Jesus or the Apostles taught.

What Should the Life of a True Believer Look Like?

A person who truly believes in Christ should exhibit a changed life. If faith is genuine, it produces fruit (John 15:5-6). This means:

• Living a holy life (1 Peter 1:15-16 – “Be holy, for I am holy.”)

• Growing in love for God and others (Matthew 22:37-39 – “Love the Lord your God… and love your neighbor as yourself.”)

• Receiving the sacraments (Baptism, the Eucharist, and Confession as Jesus commanded)

• Enduring trials with faith (James 1:12 – “Blessed is the one who perseveres under trial.”)

• Obeying Christ’s commandments (John 14:15 – “If you love Me, you will keep My commandments.”)

True faith is not a one-time emotional experience—it is a daily surrender to Christ, a life of discipleship, and a journey of grace.

Conclusion: Faith is a Lifelong Commitment

The idea that salvation is a one-and-done event contradicts Scripture. While faith in Christ is essential, it is not merely about saying a prayer—it is about living in union with Him, trusting in His grace, repenting when we fall, and persevering until the end (Matthew 24:13).

Jesus didn’t just ask people to believe—He called them to follow. True salvation is not just about a moment of faith, but a lifetime of faithfulness.

---

"Rome's False Gospel Gives No Peace"

I recently came across some YouTube videos from anti-Catholic Protestant/Evangelical preachers claiming that “Rome’s false Gospel gives no peace” and that the Catholic Church “presents a different Gospel with a different Christ.”

The truth is, Catholics do reject once saved, always saved—also called blessed assurance or eternal security—the belief that salvation can never be lost after coming to faith in Christ. But rejecting this idea does not mean we lack peace. On the contrary, our confidence is in the true Gospel and the real Christ, as faithfully taught by the Catholic Church.

Do Catholics Lack Peace and Assurance? A Closer Look

Some anti-Catholic Evangelical preachers claim that the Catholic Church teaches a "false Gospel" that offers "no peace." But is this true? The idea that Catholics live in fear and uncertainty because we reject once saved, always saved is a fundamental misunderstanding of our faith.

While Catholics do not believe in an unconditional guarantee of Heaven regardless of how we live, we have absolute confidence in God’s love, mercy, and promises. Our hope is not in a one-time declaration of faith but in a lifelong relationship with Christ, who sustains us by His grace.

Catholic Hope: Rooted in Christ

Our hope is built on God’s faithfulness, not a false sense of security that ignores free will and personal responsibility. Scripture teaches that salvation is a journey requiring perseverance, yet God remains ever faithful in guiding us:

📖 Philippians 1:6 – “He who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion until the day of Christ Jesus.”

📖 Romans 8:24-25 – “For in hope we were saved... But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait with endurance.”

📖 2 Timothy 4:7-8 – St. Paul, near the end of his life, proclaims his confidence in salvation: “I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith. From now on, the crown of righteousness awaits me.”

These verses affirm that our salvation is not a one-time event but an ongoing process in which God continues to work within us as we remain faithful to Him.

Do Catholics Live in Fear of Hell?

Absolutely not. While we acknowledge that sin can separate us from God (Isaiah 59:2, 1 Corinthians 6:9-10), we also know that He is abundantly merciful. Through faith, repentance, the sacraments, and a life of holiness, we remain in His grace.

Jesus did not call His disciples to live in fear but to trust in Him while remaining vigilant:

📖 John 14:27 – “Peace I leave with you; My peace I give to you. Not as the world gives do I give it to you. Do not let your hearts be troubled or afraid.”

📖 Romans 5:1-2 – “Since we have been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ.”

Far from living in fear, Catholics rest in Christ’s peace while recognizing the call to remain faithful.

Why Once Saved, Always Saved Is False Hope

The Bible repeatedly warns that believers can fall away through sin and unbelief:

📖 Hebrews 10:26-27 – “If we sin deliberately after receiving knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a fearful prospect of judgment.”

📖 1 Corinthians 9:27 – St. Paul himself says: “I discipline my body and bring it under control, lest after preaching to others I myself should be disqualified.”

📖 Revelation 3:5 – “The one who conquers will be clothed thus in white garments, and I will never blot his name out of the book of life.” (This clearly implies that names can be blotted out.)

Rather than placing faith in a man-made doctrine of guaranteed salvation, Catholics embrace a living hope—trusting in God’s grace while recognizing the need to remain faithful. This is why St. Paul tells us to “work out our salvation with fear and trembling” (Philippians 2:12)—not in terror, but in reverence and love for God.

True Christian Assurance: Trusting in Christ

Catholics do not rely on a superficial assurance of salvation. Our peace and confidence come from trusting in Christ daily, receiving His grace through the sacraments, and living in His love. We walk this journey with joy, knowing that God is always ready to forgive, strengthen, and guide us toward eternal life

The Catholic Church Teaches the Full Gospel of Salvation

 

The Gospel of salvation, according to the Catholic Church, is this: Through Jesus Christ’s life, death, and resurrection, God offers the free gift of salvation, calling us to repentance, faith, baptism, and a life of grace in union with Him, so that we may share in eternal life.

The Catholic Church Teaches the Full Gospel of Salvation

The Catholic Church presents the complete, biblical Gospel of salvation as revealed by Jesus Christ and handed down through Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition. It upholds the fullness of God’s plan for salvation, rather than focusing on just a few select verses. In contrast, many Protestant and Evangelical groups emphasize only a partial Gospel—often reducing salvation to "faith alone" while neglecting the biblical teachings on baptism, good works, the sacraments, perseverance, and the necessity of the Church.

Furthermore, many Protestants and Evangelicals hold to doctrines such as "eternal security," "blessed assurance," or "once saved, always saved," which claim that once a person has faith in Christ, they can never lose their salvation—regardless of how they live afterward. However, the Catholic Church, in agreement with the whole of Scripture and early Christian teaching, affirms that salvation is not a one-time event but a lifelong journey of faith, grace, and obedience, in which a person can indeed fall from grace and lose salvation.

Here is a comprehensive list of Bible passages about salvation and how to be saved, with full quotes:

---

1. Salvation Comes Through Jesus Christ Alone

• Acts 4:12 – "There is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved."

• John 14:6 – "Jesus said to him, 'I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.'"

• 1 Timothy 2:5-6 – "For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who gave himself as a ransom for all, the testimony given at the proper time."

---

2. Salvation Is a Gift of God’s Grace, Not Earned by Works Alone

• Ephesians 2:8-9 – "For by grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not from you; it is the gift of God; it is not from works, so that no one may boast."

• Titus 3:5 – "He saved us, not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to His own mercy, through the washing of regeneration and renewal by the Holy Spirit."

• Romans 6:23 – "For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord."

---

3. Faith in Jesus Is Necessary for Salvation

• John 3:16 – "For God so loved the world that He gave His only Son, so that everyone who believes in Him may not perish but may have eternal life."

• John 3:36 – "Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life; whoever does not obey the Son will not see life, but the wrath of God remains upon him."

• Romans 10:9 – "If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved."

---

4. Baptism Is Necessary for Salvation

• Mark 16:16 – "Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved; whoever does not believe will be condemned."

• John 3:5 – "Jesus answered, 'Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.'"

• Acts 2:38 – "Peter said to them, 'Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.'"

• 1 Peter 3:21 – "Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you—not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a clear conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ."

---

5. Repentance Is Necessary for Salvation

• Luke 13:3 – "No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all perish as well."

• Acts 3:19 – "Repent, therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be wiped away."

• 2 Corinthians 7:10 – "For godly grief produces a repentance that leads to salvation without regret, whereas worldly grief produces death."

---

6. Obedience and Good Works Are Part of Salvation

• Matthew 7:21 – "Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of My Father in heaven."

• James 2:24 – "You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone."

• Philippians 2:12 – "Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling."

• Romans 2:6-7 – "He will repay each one according to his works: eternal life to those who seek glory, honor, and immortality through perseverance in good works."

---

7. Salvation Requires Perseverance Until the End

• Matthew 24:13 – "But the one who perseveres to the end will be saved."

• Hebrews 10:26-27 – "For if we sin deliberately after receiving knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a fearful prospect of judgment and a fury of fire about to consume the adversaries."

• Revelation 2:10 – "Be faithful unto death, and I will give you the crown of life."

---

8. The Eucharist and the Church Are Part of Salvation

• John 6:53-54 – "Jesus said to them, 'Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you. Whoever eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.'"

• 1 Corinthians 10:16 – "The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a sharing in the blood of Christ? The bread that we break, is it not a sharing in the body of Christ?"

• 1 Timothy 3:15 – "The Church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of the truth." 

9. The Necessity of the Sacrament of Reconciliation 

Sin separates us from God, and Jesus provided a means for our sins to be forgiven even after baptism: the Sacrament of Reconciliation (Confession). Christ gave His apostles the authority to forgive sins, a power passed down through their successors, the bishops and priests of the Church.

• John 20:22-23 – "And when He had said this, He breathed on them and said to them, ‘Receive the Holy Spirit. Whose sins you forgive are forgiven them, and whose sins you retain are retained.’"

• James 5:16 – "Therefore, confess your sins to one another and pray for one another, that you may be healed. The fervent prayer of a righteous person is very powerful."

• Matthew 18:18 – "Amen, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."

How We Are to Confess Our Sins To receive the grace of forgiveness, we must:

1. Examine our conscience and recognize our sins.

2. Feel true sorrow and contrition for offending God.

3. Confess our sins honestly to a priest.

4. Receive absolution through the priest, acting in the person of Christ.

5. Perform the assigned penance as an act of reparation.

The Role of Priests as Ambassadors of Christ 

Jesus established the priesthood to continue His ministry of reconciliation. Priests act as Christ’s representatives in administering the sacraments, particularly Confession and the Eucharist.

• 2 Corinthians 5:18-20 – "All this is from God, who has reconciled us to Himself through Christ and given us the ministry of reconciliation, namely, God was reconciling the world to Himself in Christ, not counting their trespasses against them, and entrusting to us the message of reconciliation. So we are ambassadors for Christ, as if God were appealing through us. We implore you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God."

• Hebrews 5:1 – "Every high priest is taken from among men and made their representative before God, to offer gifts and sacrifices for sins." 

By going to Confession, we follow Christ’s teaching and receive His grace through the Church He established. The Sacrament of Reconciliation is a vital part of the journey of salvation, restoring us to God’s grace when we have fallen into sin. Along with faith, baptism, and the other sacraments, it ensures that we remain in communion with Christ and His Church, striving toward eternal life.

---

Conclusion: How to Be Saved According to the Bible

According to Scripture, salvation is a gift from God, but it requires a faith-filled response from us. The Bible teaches that:

1. Believe in Jesus Christ (John 3:16, Romans 10:9).

2. Repent of your sins (Luke 13:3, Acts 3:19).

3. Be baptized (Mark 16:16, Acts 2:38).

4. Live a life of obedience and holiness (Matthew 7:21, James 2:24).

5. Persevere in faith until the end (Matthew 24:13, Revelation 2:10).

6. Partake in the sacraments, especially the Eucharist (John 6:53-54, 1 Corinthians 10:16).

This is the full biblical picture of salvation—not just faith alone, but faith working through love (Galatians 5:6), lived out in obedience and sacramental life within the Church Christ established.

We Are Catholics, NOT ROMAN Catholics

 

The Name of the Catholic Church: A Clarification

As Catholics, we do not refer to ourselves as "Roman Catholics," nor do we officially call our Church the "Roman Catholic Church." The true and historic name of the Church is simply the Catholic Church—the universal Church founded by Jesus Christ upon Peter (Matthew 16:18).

While it is true that in some places, particularly in legal and governmental contexts, the term "Roman Catholic Church" is used as an official designation, this is not the Church’s proper name. The use of this term as a primary identifier is often a misunderstanding at best, and at worst, a deliberate attempt to imply that Catholicism is merely a regional or Romanized version of Christianity, rather than the original Church established by Christ.

The Protestant and Anti-Catholic Origins of "Roman Catholic"

Historically, the term "Roman Catholic" was not coined by the Church itself but was instead imposed by Protestant groups as a way of reducing the Catholic Church’s claim to universality. The intention behind this was to imply that Catholicism was only one "branch" of Christianity, limited to Rome, while other Christian groups (such as Anglicans and Protestants) were equally valid expressions of the faith.

Moreover, the term has often been associated with anti-Catholic rhetoric. Just as terms like "Romanism" and "Romanist" have been used in a derogatory manner to suggest that Catholics worship the Pope or practice pagan Roman traditions, the phrase "Roman Catholic" has frequently been employed by those seeking to portray Catholicism as a man-made institution rooted in Rome rather than in Christ.

Why "Roman Catholic" is a Misnomer

1. The Catholic Church is Universal, Not Merely Roman

   • The word "Catholic" means "universal" and has been used since the earliest days of Christianity to describe the Church that Christ founded.

   • St. Ignatius of Antioch (c. A.D. 107) was the first to explicitly use the term "Catholic Church" in his Letter to the Smyrnaeans:

     "Wherever the bishop appears, let the people be there; just as wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church."

2. The Church Has Multiple Rites, Not Just the Roman Rite

   • While most Catholics in the West attend the Latin Rite (often called the "Roman Rite"), there are 23 Eastern Catholic Churches in full communion with Rome, each with its own liturgical traditions and spiritual heritage. These include:

     • The Byzantine Catholic Church

     • The Maronite Catholic Church

     • The Chaldean Catholic Church

     • The Melkite Catholic Church, etc.

   • To call the Church "Roman Catholic" ignores these rich traditions and falsely suggests that Catholicism is exclusively tied to Rome.

3. The Pope is the Bishop of Rome, But the Church is Not Centered on Rome Alone

   • The Pope, as the Successor of St. Peter, is the visible head of the Catholic Church. He happens to be the Bishop of Rome, but his role is not about Roman identity—it is about Christ’s commission to Peter (John 21:15-17).

   • The Pope’s authority does not come from being the Bishop of Rome per se, but from his apostolic succession to St. Peter, whom Christ established as the chief shepherd of His Church (Matthew 16:18-19).

We Are Catholics, Not "Roman" Catholics

Yes, the Pope resides in Rome. Yes, many Catholics belong to the Roman Rite. But we do not worship Rome, and our faith is not a Roman invention. We are simply Catholics—members of the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church, established by Jesus Christ Himself.

To insist on calling the Church "Roman Catholic" is to misunderstand or distort its true identity. Those who use this term to imply that we are merely a "Roman sect" are as mistaken as those who refer to Catholic doctrine as "Romanism."

The Catholic Church is not Roman—it is universal. It belongs not to Rome, but to Christ.

A Final Word to Those Seeking to Convert Catholics

If your goal is to convert me away from my Catholic faith, using the term "Roman Catholic" is not a great start. It's a label imposed by those outside the Church, often with condescending or polemical intent. If you address me that way, don’t expect a debate—just expect a blank stare. Because I am not a "Roman" Catholic.

I am simply Catholic.

Lent and the Gospel: A Debate on Faith, Works, and Salvation

 Lent and the Gospel: A Debate on Faith, Works, and Salvation

Lent has arrived once again, and as always, some anti-Catholic groups will claim that it is "pagan" and contradicts both the Gospel and Scripture. They argue that Lent transforms salvation—received by faith through grace alone—into a "works-based salvation." While I will address the "pagan" allegations in a separate discussion, this article will focus on why some groups believe Lent contradicts and even nullifies the Gospel.

As a Catholic, I observe Lent with devotion, striving to live according to its precepts and sacred Traditions. Beyond simply following Church teaching, I find that the practices of prayer, fasting, abstinence, and almsgiving—though valuable at any time of year—hold a unique spiritual significance in this season leading up to Pascua. They serve as a means of deepening my relationship with God, fostering holiness, and participating in the process of theosis or sanctification. However, not all Christian groups share this perspective. Some believe that Lent contradicts the Gospel and Scripture, turning faith into a "works-based salvation." In this discussion, we will explore why certain groups reject Lenten observances, why others embrace them, and how the Catholic Church understands and defends this sacred season.

The Gospel and the Debate Over Lent: Faith, Works, and Salvation

The Gospel, according to the Catholic Church, is the Good News of Jesus Christ—His life, death, and resurrection—through which He offers salvation and eternal life to all who believe in Him and follow His teachings. However, within Christianity, debates persist over how this Gospel should be understood and practiced, particularly regarding the observance of Lent.

Some Protestant and anti-Catholic groups reject Lent, arguing that its associated practices—fasting, prayer, and almsgiving—are works-based and contradict the biblical doctrine of salvation by grace alone through faith alone (Ephesians 2:8-9). From their perspective, salvation is a free gift from God that requires no additional actions beyond faith in Christ. They contend that engaging in Lenten observances implies that believers must perform acts of self-denial or good works to grow closer to God or to merit His grace, which they see as an affront to the sufficiency of Christ’s atonement.

Dr. John MacArthur, a well-known Protestant theologian, has criticized Lenten practices, stating: “The idea that we must somehow suffer or deprive ourselves to earn God’s favor or grow in holiness denies the sufficiency of Christ’s sacrifice. Our sanctification is the work of the Holy Spirit, not our own religious efforts.” Likewise, many evangelical groups argue that fasting and penance resemble Old Testament legalism rather than New Testament freedom in Christ.

Historically, the Protestant Reformation was largely a rejection of perceived Catholic legalism, and many reformers dismissed Lent as an unbiblical human tradition. Ulrich Zwingli, a Swiss reformer, opposed fasting regulations, writing that “God alone is to be served in spirit and in truth, not in outward observances.” Many evangelical churches today continue this tradition, emphasizing personal devotion over formalized liturgical practices.

The Ash Wednesday Debate

Additionally, some Protestant sects argue that the tradition of wearing ashes on one's forehead on Ash Wednesday contradicts Jesus' teaching in Matthew 6:16-18, where He instructs His followers not to look dismal when fasting but to wash their faces. They interpret this passage as a direct rejection of outward displays of piety, claiming that wearing ashes is an unbiblical, man-made tradition.

The Catholic Church, however, sees Ash Wednesday as a deeply biblical and meaningful tradition. The ashes serve as a sign of repentance, humility, and mortality, reminding believers of their dependence on God's mercy. The practice is rooted in Scripture, where ashes are frequently used as a symbol of penitence (e.g., Jonah 3:6, Daniel 9:3, Job 42:6). Rather than contradicting Jesus' words, the Catholic perspective holds that His teaching in Matthew 6 was a warning against hypocrisy, not against visible acts of faith performed with sincere heart.

The Catholic Perspective: Lent as a Gospel-Centered Practice

On the other hand, the Catholic Church—and even some Protestant denominations—defend Lent as a biblically rooted and spiritually enriching practice that aligns with, rather than contradicts, the Gospel. The Catechism of the Catholic Church states: “By the solemn forty days of Lent, the Church unites herself each year to the mystery of Jesus in the desert” (CCC 540).

Catholics do not view Lenten practices as a means of earning salvation but as a way to deepen one's relationship with Christ and conform more closely to His image. The Church teaches that works of penance, such as fasting, prayer, and almsgiving, are not done to earn God’s love but as a response to it. Pope Benedict XVI clarified this, stating: “Lent is not simply a time of self-denial; it is a time of deepening our faith in Christ and allowing His grace to transform us.”

Scripture itself supports fasting, prayer, and almsgiving as ways to grow in holiness. Jesus fasted for forty days in the wilderness (Matthew 4:1-11) and instructed His followers to fast (Matthew 6:16-18). The early Church continued these practices, as seen in Acts 13:2-3, where believers fasted and prayed before making important decisions.

Protestant Denominations That Observe Lent

Not all Protestants reject Lent. Many liturgical Protestant traditions, such as Anglicans, Lutherans, and Methodists, embrace Lent as a meaningful season of reflection. Martin Luther, though critical of Catholicism, did not reject fasting outright. In his Small Catechism, he wrote: “Fasting and bodily preparation are certainly fine outward training.” The Book of Common Prayer, central to Anglican worship, includes Lenten prayers and encourages fasting and self-examination. John Wesley, founder of Methodism, fasted regularly and saw spiritual value in the practice.

The Early Church on Lent and Spiritual Disciplines

The earliest Christians practiced fasting and penance as a response to God’s grace. The Church Father Tertullian (c. 155–220 AD) wrote, “Fasting possesses great power. If practiced with the right intention, it makes our prayers more effective and strengthens our relationship with God.” The Council of Nicaea (325 AD) formalized the forty-day Lenten season, reinforcing its widespread observance.

Conclusion: A Matter of Interpretation

Ultimately, the debate over Lent reflects broader theological differences regarding faith, works, and salvation. While some Protestant groups reject Lenten observances as a return to legalism, the Catholic Church and various Protestant traditions see them as a biblical and historical means of spiritual renewal. Far from undermining the Gospel, Lent, when properly understood, serves as a season of deeper conversion, echoing the words of James 2:17: “Faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead.”

Mardi Gras is Pagan

Mardi Gras and Carnival: A Catholic Perspective on Celebration, History, and Holiness

---

Mardi Gras—known as Carnivale in many Latin countries—will be celebrated on March 4th, 2025. For most people, both Catholic and non-Catholic, it’s a joyful, lively tradition marked by parades, music, and celebration. But not everyone sees it that way. Some view Mardi Gras as rooted in immorality, paganism, or even evil. So what’s the truth? And should Christians take part in it? This article explores the history, theology, and debates surrounding Mardi Gras to help answer that question.

---

Catholic Origins and Liturgical Context

Mardi Gras, or "Fat Tuesday," is the culmination of the Carnival season, a time of festivity before the penitential season of Lent. In Catholic tradition, Lent is a 40-day period of fasting, prayer, and almsgiving, modeled after Christ’s 40 days in the desert (Matthew 4:1–11). Mardi Gras is not a secular or pagan invention but has deep roots in the Christian liturgical calendar as a last joyful feast before the solemn discipline of Lent begins on Ash Wednesday.

The term "Carnival" is believed to originate from the Latin carne levare, meaning "to remove meat," symbolizing the upcoming Lenten abstinence from meat and rich foods. This final day of indulgence serves a purpose: to emphasize contrast, to fully appreciate the coming spiritual fast.

Historical Development Within the Church

As Christianity spread across Europe, it often baptized and adapted local customs into the liturgical life of the Church, not as compromise but as evangelization. Pope Gregory the Great, in the 6th century, instructed missionaries to preserve as much of indigenous culture as possible, redirecting it toward the worship of God. Thus, Carnival traditions—feasts, music, masquerades—were incorporated into Catholic societies as expressions of joy and community before Lent.

Cities like Venice and later colonial New Orleans developed elaborate Carnival customs rooted in Catholic cultures. These were not pagan revivals but incarnational in spirit: expressions of Catholic life that recognize the full range of human emotion and the rhythm of feasting and fasting.

Theological and Moral Framework

The Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC 1809) teaches: “Temperance is the moral virtue that moderates the attraction of pleasures and provides balance in the use of created goods.” Carnival is legitimate as long as it is ordered toward the good, rooted in joy, and not disordered by sin.

Catholic theology acknowledges that celebration and joy are not sinful in themselves. Jesus attended feasts (John 2:1–11), and Ecclesiastes 3:4 reminds us there is "a time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to mourn, and a time to dance."

But the Church strongly warns against turning Mardi Gras into an excuse for vice:

• Galatians 5:13: “Do not use your freedom as an opportunity for the flesh.”

• 1 Peter 2:16: “Live as people who are free, not using your freedom as a cover-up for evil.”

Pagan Concerns and Catholic Clarification

Some critics, particularly from Protestant backgrounds, accuse Mardi Gras of being a continuation of paganism or Babylonian mystery religions. This view often misunderstands the Church’s historical approach. Catholicism has long transformed what was once pagan into something sanctified.

The Church Fathers acknowledged this principle. St. Augustine famously said, “The devil is a monkey. He imitates the things of God.” Pagan practices that mirrored truth could be redeemed, redirected to God. Pope Benedict XVI emphasized this approach, urging Christians to transform culture rather than reject it wholesale.

The Danger of Excess

While Mardi Gras has Catholic roots, the Church does not endorse the sinful behavior sometimes associated with modern celebrations. The excesses—drunkenness, promiscuity, and revelry devoid of spiritual context—are not part of authentic Catholic Carnival. Rather, they reflect secularization and a loss of the season's true purpose.

St. Paul’s words apply clearly:

• Romans 13:13: “Let us behave decently, as in the daytime, not in orgies and drunkenness, not in sexual immorality and debauchery.”

Where Mardi Gras becomes an occasion for mortal sin, it is no longer Catholic in spirit. Catholics are called to celebrate rightly, with joy rooted in gratitude, not license.

Should Catholics Celebrate Mardi Gras?

Yes—if it is celebrated in the proper Catholic spirit.

Catholicism embraces the body and the senses as good, created by God. Celebration is part of being human. But every celebration must be ordered toward virtue. Mardi Gras is not evil—it is human, cultural, and spiritual when understood correctly. As Pope Francis said, “A Christian is joyful. Even in pain and persecution, the Christian sings. Joy is the sign of the presence of God.”

Guidelines for Catholic Participation:

• Intention: Celebrate with the goal of honoring God and building community.

• Moderation: Avoid gluttony, drunkenness, and scandal.

• Preparation: Let Mardi Gras remind you that Lent is coming—make a plan for penance and prayer.

Conclusion

Mardi Gras is not a mistake or a pagan leftover—it is a Catholic cultural expression of joy before penance. It reflects the Church’s understanding of human nature: we are not angels, but embodied souls who need seasons of both feasting and fasting. Like all good things, Carnival must be ordered by virtue. Celebrated rightly, Mardi Gras becomes a prelude to spiritual renewal. Celebrated wrongly, it becomes a parody of its purpose.

The Church does not reject culture; it redeems it. And Mardi Gras, in its authentic form, is one more way Catholics live the rhythm of grace in time.

Catholics & Politics

 

The Catholic Church, Christianity, and Political Participation: A Balanced Perspective

The question of Christian involvement in politics has been a source of rich dialogue and debate across centuries. While some Christians advocate for active engagement in political life as a means of promoting justice and the common good, others emphasize a life of separation from worldly affairs, aligning solely with the Kingdom of God. Drawing from Scripture, the teachings of the Catholic Church, and Protestant perspectives, this reflection examines the role of Christians in politics and the balance between active participation and spiritual detachment.

1. Scriptural Foundations: Engaged, but Set Apart

The Bible provides insights into how believers are to navigate their relationship with earthly governments. In the New Testament, St. Paul urges Christians to “be subject to the governing authorities” (Romans 13:1) and writes that governments exist to promote order and justice, an idea echoed by St. Peter, who advises Christians to “fear God, honor the emperor” (1 Peter 2:17). However, while Jesus acknowledges the legitimacy of government authority, His response to the Pharisees—“Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s” (Mark 12:17)—indicates a clear distinction between political obligations and spiritual devotion.

Jesus also reminds His followers that His Kingdom is “not of this world” (John 18:36), suggesting a perspective that transcends political affiliation. Early Christians, including Apostolic Fathers like Tertullian, often refrained from public office, seeing political engagement as potentially conflicting with their faith, especially under pagan rule.

2. Catholic Social Teaching and Political Responsibility

The Catholic Church’s position on political involvement has developed over time, shaped by a belief that Christians are called to work for the common good and uphold moral values within society. The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that participation in public life is a duty: “Submission to authority and co-responsibility for the common good make it morally obligatory to pay taxes, to exercise the right to vote, and to defend one’s country” (CCC 2240). Thus, the Church encourages voting and responsible civic participation as expressions of one’s faith.

However, the Church also cautions against becoming too entangled in politics. In Gaudium et Spes, the Second Vatican Council taught that while Christians should engage in society to promote justice, they must remember their primary allegiance to God, which prevents them from compromising Gospel values for political gain (Gaudium et Spes, 76). The Church, therefore, advises Catholics to engage critically with politics, avoiding blind allegiance to any party or ideology.

Pope John Paul II elaborated on this balance, urging Catholics to view political involvement as a means of advancing human dignity and the common good. His encyclical Christifideles Laici emphasizes that the lay faithful have a unique role in transforming society and should contribute “to the sanctification of the world from within” (Christifideles Laici, 15). By bringing their faith into public life, Catholics can work to build a just society that reflects Gospel values.

3. Running for Office: A Call to Serve the Common Good

The Church also addresses the potential for Catholics to hold public office, provided they see it as a vocation to serve, rather than a means of gaining power. The Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church encourages Catholics to consider political office as a way of pursuing the common good, provided they prioritize moral principles and human dignity (Compendium, 565). St. Thomas Aquinas argued that rulers have a responsibility to promote justice, warning that power can corrupt if pursued for selfish ends.

Pope Francis echoes this, advising Catholics in public life to promote “a true politics that puts human dignity and the common good first” (Fratelli Tutti, 154). Political leaders, in this view, should be guided by humility, compassion, and a desire to protect the most vulnerable. Thus, Catholics may view political office as a means of service, provided they remember that their primary allegiance is to God.

4. A Protestant Perspective: Active Engagement vs. Spiritual Detachment

Protestant views on politics vary widely, but many denominations encourage responsible engagement with society. The Protestant Reformer Martin Luther argued that God operates in two realms: the “kingdom of the world” and the “kingdom of God.” While the former is governed by civil law and authority, the latter is ruled by grace. Luther believed Christians could serve in public office without compromising their faith, as long as they pursued justice and acted ethically.

The Anabaptist tradition, however, is more cautious about political involvement. Anabaptists, including the Mennonites, have historically advocated for pacifism and separation from secular government, emphasizing allegiance to God’s Kingdom over any earthly authority. This view aligns with Jesus’ call for His followers to be “in the world but not of the world” (John 17:16), focusing on spiritual matters rather than worldly concerns.

Evangelicals and other Protestant denominations often embrace political engagement, particularly when issues like religious freedom and social justice are at stake. Influential Protestant theologians such as Reinhold Niebuhr argued for a “Christian realism” that acknowledges human imperfection but also recognizes the need for Christians to influence society positively. Niebuhr warned against idealism, emphasizing that Christian engagement in politics must be realistic, focusing on attainable goals that uphold justice and peace.

5. Political Neutrality and Pacifism: The Call to Spiritual Detachment

Throughout Christian history, some have argued that political neutrality or detachment is preferable. Early Christian communities largely refrained from political involvement, focusing instead on building the Kingdom of God. Tertullian and Origen were early proponents of Christian pacifism, advocating for a stance of non-violence and separation from secular government, which they saw as often morally compromised.

St. Augustine provided a nuanced view, suggesting that Christians are “citizens of two cities”: the earthly city and the City of God. In The City of God, Augustine argued that while Christians must live in the world, their ultimate allegiance lies with God’s Kingdom. Political systems, he believed, are temporary and imperfect, often marked by corruption. This perspective has influenced many Christian thinkers, who emphasize that while Christians can participate in politics, they must do so with detachment and humility, recognizing that true justice comes only from God.

6. Modern Catholic Guidance on Political Engagement

Pope Benedict XVI advised Catholics to approach politics as an opportunity for charity in truth, stating, “The Church cannot and must not take upon herself the political battle” (Deus Caritas Est, 28). He cautioned against letting political power overshadow the Church’s mission, encouraging Christians to be active citizens but also to avoid letting politics dominate their lives.

Pope Francis, in Fratelli Tutti, called for a “better kind of politics,” one rooted in charity, humility, and concern for the marginalized. Francis advocates for political systems that prioritize the dignity of every person, noting that Christians should bring a spirit of service and compassion to public life. He frequently warns against nationalism and divisiveness, reminding Catholics that the Church is universal and that love transcends borders and political affiliations.

7. Balancing Allegiance to the Kingdom of God and Earthly Participation

Christians face a delicate balance between participating in earthly governments and recognizing their ultimate citizenship in the Kingdom of God. Jesus’ words remind Christians that while they are in the world, they are not “of the world” (John 17:16). For Catholics, this means that while political engagement is often necessary, it should never overshadow the primary mission of living out the Gospel and serving others.

The Second Vatican Council reinforced this, teaching that “the Church…serves as a leaven and as a kind of soul for human society” (Gaudium et Spes, 40). This vision suggests that Christians should see their involvement in the world as a way of promoting values that reflect the Kingdom of God, such as peace, justice, and love. However, they must always prioritize their faith and remain focused on the ultimate hope of eternal life with God.

Conclusion: An Informed, Balanced Approach

Catholic and other Christian teachings offer a balanced approach to political engagement, encouraging participation that upholds justice, compassion, and the common good. Christians are called to participate in politics thoughtfully, using their influence to build a just society, yet without becoming overly attached to worldly power or ideologies.

For Christians, the ultimate focus remains the Kingdom of God. Political engagement, when done with humility and purpose, is a way of working toward a world that reflects God’s love and justice. The Church’s stance is clear: Christians should engage in politics but remain grounded in their faith, recognizing that true peace and justice are found in God alone.

Related: 

American Exceptionalism: Its Relevance Today and a Catholic Perspective

How Should Catholics and Other Christians View the 2024 Re-election of President Trump? A Faithful, Objective Approach

The Catholic Faith and Veterans Day: A Reflection on Patriotism, Peace, and Christian Duty