Sunday, July 27, 2025

Why I Am Catholic: Catholic Pope vs. Evangelical/Non-denominational Pastor



 This Is Another Reason I Am Catholic: Real Authority, Apostolic Succession, and the Limits of Evangelical Leadership

This is another reason I am Catholic: because I believe that if God truly established one Church to carry His authority on Earth, it wouldn’t be invisible, fractured, or improvised. It would be visible, unified, and divinely structured. That Church would speak with clarity. It would have global reach. It would still be standing after 2,000 years.

And it does. It’s the Catholic Church.

The Pope is not just a religious leader. He is the successor of Saint Peter, appointed by Christ to lead the Church: “You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church” (Matthew 16:18). He occupies the most enduring office in human history. His authority isn’t invented—it’s inherited through Apostolic Succession. That alone sets the Catholic Church apart from every denomination and independent ministry in the world.

By contrast, Evangelical and non-denominational pastors operate outside of that divine framework. They may have strong preaching, emotional worship, and authentic zeal—but they lack what matters most: legitimate spiritual authority passed down from the apostles themselves.

The Pope vs. the Pastor: One Rules from Apostolic Legacy, the Other from Charisma

Being Pope is like being the President of a global spiritual nation. You surrender your personal life. You don’t decide where you live, what you eat, or where you go. Everything is provided for you, but at the cost of total self-sacrifice. You are no longer just a man—you are the visible head of Christ’s Church on Earth.

The Vatican is a sovereign state. The Pope addresses heads of state, issues encyclicals that shape global ethics, and speaks to 1.3 billion Catholics. He has real influence—not through politics or wealth, but through apostolic authority. When he speaks on faith and morals in communion with the bishops, the Church listens—and the world often pays attention.

In sharp contrast, most Evangelical and non-denominational pastors serve in obscurity. Their influence is usually limited to a local congregation. They are not part of any historical chain of leadership. They have no institutional structure behind them, no global body in communion, no magisterium, no shared creed, no sacraments instituted by Christ flowing through Apostolic hands.

Most are self-appointed or congregation-appointed. Their “ordination” is not sacramental, nor is it linked to the original Church Christ founded. They can start a new church anytime, anywhere, with no authority but their own sense of calling. As Protestant theologian Carl Trueman once admitted:

“Evangelicalism, especially in its independent and non-denominational forms, has no center of gravity... It runs on personality and platform, not office.”
(First Things, 2021)

Apostolic Succession: The Unbroken Chain

One of the clearest marks of the true Church is Apostolic Succession—the unbroken line of bishops from the apostles to today. As St. Irenaeus wrote in the 2nd century:

“It is possible, then, for everyone in every church, who may wish to know the truth, to contemplate the tradition of the apostles... which has been made known throughout the whole world.”
(Against Heresies, Book III)

Evangelical churches don’t just lack succession—they often reject it altogether. Their teachings are derived from private interpretation of Scripture, not the living Tradition passed down from the apostles. Their ministries arise from movements or reactions, not divine commission through the Church Christ instituted.

That’s why the Catechism of the Catholic Church says clearly:

“The sole Church of Christ... subsists in the Catholic Church, which is governed by the successor of Peter and by the bishops in communion with him.”
(CCC 816)

This isn’t arrogance—it’s clarity. Unity and authority are not optional extras; they are marks of the Church.

Sacraments and Spiritual Power

Catholic priests don’t just preach—they act in persona Christi. Through ordination, their souls are permanently configured to Christ. They don’t merely symbolize forgiveness or communion; they bring it about through the sacraments.

Evangelical pastors can preach the Gospel, but they cannot absolve sins in confession (John 20:23), or consecrate the Eucharist (Luke 22:19), or anoint the sick sacramentally (James 5:14–15). They cannot administer true sacraments because they do not possess apostolic orders. Their ministry is spiritual in intention, but disconnected from the supernatural graces Christ entrusted to His Church.

The sacraments are not optional rituals—they are the ordinary means God gives us for salvation. Without them, Christianity becomes a well-meant philosophy rather than a supernatural encounter.

Unity vs. Division

Jesus prayed “that they may all be one” (John 17:21). He didn’t found thousands of loosely affiliated ministries competing for followers. The Catholic Church is one, holy, catholic, and apostolic—not in theory, but in visible reality.

Evangelicalism is marked by fragmentation. There are over 30,000 Protestant denominations. Even within Evangelical circles, churches split constantly over doctrine, music style, leadership preferences, or cultural issues. Truth becomes negotiable. Authority becomes local. Unity becomes impossible.

But the Church Christ founded is not divided. It is one body with one head.


Final Word: Why I Am Catholic

This is another reason I am Catholic: because Christ didn’t leave us a book and walk away. He established a Church. A visible, authoritative, sacramental Church—built on Peter, governed by the apostles and their successors, and sustained by the Holy Spirit.

The Pope sits in the chair of Peter. The bishops follow the line of the apostles. The sacraments flow from Christ Himself. This isn’t man-made authority—it is divinely conferred.

No other Church has this.

No other pastor has this.

No other voice speaks for God with the authority Christ gave to His Church.

And that’s why I will remain Catholic.

Tuesday, July 22, 2025

A Catholic Perspective on the Israel–Palestine Conflict

 



Children of Abraham, Land of Tears

A Catholic Perspective on the Israel–Palestine Conflict

By Chris M. Forte

“Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called children of God.”
Matthew 5:9

___________________________________________

 

I. Prologue: The Holy Land and the Holy War

There is a strip of land on the Mediterranean coast called many things: Canaan, Judea, Israel, Palestine—the Holy Land.

For Jews, it is the land of promise.
For Muslims, the land of the Prophet’s ascension.
For Christians, it is the land where God became flesh.

And yet today, it is a land of blood.
The Israel–Palestine conflict is not just a political standoff—it is a spiritual and humanitarian tragedy. This exposé explores the historical, theological, and moral dimensions of this crisis from a Catholic perspective.


II. The Children of Abraham: Isaac and Ishmael

“God heard the cry of the boy.” — Genesis 21:17

The conflict between Jews and Arabs is often traced—allegorically and historically—to the sons of Abraham:

  • Isaac, through whom Jews trace their lineage,

  • Ishmael, traditionally considered the forefather of the Arabs.

Though separated by blood and story, both are children of promise.

The Catholic Church affirms that both Jews and Muslims worship the one Creator:

“The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place among whom are the Muslims.”
— Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) §841

But only in Christ Jesus is the fullness of the covenant revealed, uniting Jew and Gentile, Isaac and Ishmael, into the New Israel—the Church.


III. From Rome to Jerusalem: Christianity’s Deep Roots

After Christ’s Resurrection, the Church took root in Jerusalem but was scattered following Roman persecution. Christianity spread to Antioch, then to Rome, evolving into a universal Church, no longer bound by land or ethnic bloodlines.

And yet, Christians never left the Holy Land.
To this day, Catholics of the Latin, Melkite, Maronite, and Armenian rites live and worship where Christ once walked.

But now, their future is in peril.


IV. The Zionist Movement and the Founding of Israel

After the Holocaust, the international community backed the idea of a Jewish homeland. In 1947, the UN proposed a partition of Palestine, with Jerusalem under international governance.

Israel declared statehood in 1948. War erupted.
Palestinians were expelled or fled—700,000 in total. Christians among them.

The Nakba (“catastrophe”) remains a bitter memory for Palestinians, including Palestinian Christians.

“Peace requires justice. Justice requires truth. Truth demands memory.”


V. The Church’s Teaching: Not Partisanship—But Prophecy

The Vatican recognizes both Israel and Palestine, and calls for:

  • A negotiated two-state solution,

  • Full access to holy sites,

  • The end of occupation and violence on both sides.

The Church does not support violence—whether from Hamas or the IDF. It supports human dignity and the presence of Christians in their homeland.

“No one is saved alone, as an isolated individual. Rather... we are saved together.”
— Pope Francis, Fratelli Tutti


VI. Dispensationalism: A Protestant Error

Many American Evangelicals support Israel due to dispensationalist eschatology:

  • The belief that Israel is the fulfillment of prophecy,

  • That the Third Temple must be rebuilt,

  • That Christ will return after Jewish suffering in the End Times.

This view is rejected by the Catholic Church.
The Church teaches:

  • Christ is the New Temple (John 2:19),

  • The Church is the New Israel (Galatians 6:16),

  • All prophecy is fulfilled in Christ.

“The old covenant has been fulfilled in the New Covenant.”
— CCC §121–123

Dispensationalism politicizes theology and reduces salvation history to land ownership—a far cry from the universal Kingdom of God.


VII. The Suffering of Palestinian Christians

Today, Palestinian Christians are vanishing.
In Gaza, there are fewer than 1,000 left.
The Holy Family Catholic Church was bombed in 2025, killing worshippers.
The Greek Orthodox Church of Saint Porphyrius was also bombed.
In the West Bank, Christian towns face attacks from Jewish settlers with near-total impunity.

“We are forgotten by the world, and sometimes even by the Church.”
— Fr. Gabriel Romanelli, Holy Family Church, Gaza

Though targeted by no one and protected by no one, these Christians endure with faith and charity. Their schools educate Muslims and Christians alike. Their hospitals heal all.


VIII. Final Word: The Cross, Not the Flag

As a Catholic, I believe:

  • Israel is a nation, not a theological symbol.

  • It is important as the land of the Incarnation, but its government must be held to moral scrutiny like any other.

  • Criticizing a government is not antisemitism.

  • When Jewish settlers burn churches, and the State does nothing, that silence is complicity.

Our loyalty is not to nationalism, but to Christ crucified.
We must speak truth even when it is unpopular.
We must remember that Christians are dying where Christianity began.


Appendix: Sources and Resources

  1. Catechism of the Catholic Church §121–123, §841, §877 – Vatican.va

  2. Pope Francis, Fratelli TuttiVatican.va

  3. Church Bombings in Gaza (2025) – AP News

  4. History of Dispensationalism – Catholic Answers

  5. UN Partition Plan (1947) – UN Archives

  6. Holy Family Church, Gaza – Wikipedia

  7. Patriarch Pizzaballa on Gaza – Reuters

  8. History of the Nakba – Al Jazeera

  9. Settlement Violence Against Christians – Times of Israel

Recent Developments: New Outcries for Humanity

Tragedy at Gaza’s Only Catholic Church

Pope Leo XIV Responds

  • In his Angelus address at Castel Gandolfo, Pope Leo mourned the victims—Saad Salameh, Foumia Ayyad, Najwa Abu Daoud—calling for an immediate ceasefire, protection for worship spaces, and adherence to international law USCCB+3AP News+3Vatican News+3.

  • The Vatican reiterated: “The world can't take it anymore… protect civilians… end the barbarity of war” The Times of India+15USCCB+15AP News+15.

U.S. Reaction

  • Former President Donald Trump, reflecting widespread unease, personally pressured PM Netanyahu to explain and account for the attack Axios.

  • The Trump administration publicly expressed frustration with Israel's continued military actions in Gaza and Syria, warning of potential strains on U.S.–Israel relations The Times of India+4TIME+4The Times+4.

International and Humanitarian Crisis

  • A 32-nation Bogotá summit called Israel’s Gaza campaign a genocide and proposed halting arms supplies and raising accountability Wikipedia.

  • UN aid agencies called Gaza a “hell on earth” amid intensifying starvation; dozens—many children—have died seeking food The Scottish Sun+4Al Jazeera+4The Guardian+4.


The Plight of Palestinian Christians

Between Israeli airstrikes in Gaza and settler violence in the West Bank, Christian communities are vanishing. The recent church strike and broader military operations in Jenin, Tulkarm, and elsewhere highlight a trend: religious persecution masked as collateral damage.

Fr. Romanelli voiced the anguish of many:

“We are forgotten by the world, and sometimes even by the Church.”

 

Appendix: Sources & Further Reading

  1. AP News, “Pope Leo XIV renews call for ceasefire in Gaza” WikipediaWikipedia+3The Washington Post+3Vatican News+3Wikipedia+11Axios+11AP News+11

  2. Vatican News, “Pope appeals for end to Gaza ‘barbarity’” TIME+15Vatican News+15USCCB+15

  3. Time, “How Israel Appears to Be Gambling With Trump’s Patience” TIME

  4. The Bogotá Summit, Hague Group report The Times+5Wikipedia+5unrwa.org+5

  5. UN & Aid reports on Gaza humanitarian crisis unrwa.org+1The Guardian+1

  6. Wikipedia & Reuters: Holy Family Church bombing AP News+7Wikipedia+7Axios+7

  7. Catechism references and Pope Francis’s Fratelli Tutti Wikipedia

About the Author

Chris M. Forte is a Catholic writer, historian, and editor based in San Diego’s Little Italy. With a deep passion for theology, Church history, and global justice, he explores the intersection of faith, politics, and human dignity through a Catholic lens. Drawing on years of research and lived experience, Chris writes to give voice to the voiceless and shed light on forgotten corners of the Catholic world.


Catholics & Palestine: “The Cry of the Innocent”: Palestinian Christians, War, and the Catholic Response

 


“The Cry of the Innocent”: Palestinian Christians, War, and the Catholic Response

By Chris M. Forte
Editor, The Italian Californian, Why I Am Catholic

As Catholic Christians, we know that our faith was born in the land now called Israel and Palestine. Jesus Christ, our Lord, was a Jew who walked the streets of Jerusalem, taught in Galilee, and suffered on Calvary. The early Church was Jewish. And yet today, many of the descendants of those earliest Christians—our brothers and sisters in the faith—are suffering, displaced, or dead, victims not just of war, but of political indifference, ethnic violence, and the slow erasure of Christian presence in the very land where our faith began.

This post is written not in hatred, but in sorrow. Not in condemnation of a people, but in defense of truth, justice, and the innocent.


✝️ Christians in the Holy Land: Forgotten Witnesses

For 2,000 years, Christians have lived continuously in the land of Jesus. Today, however, Palestinian Christians—both in the West Bank and Gaza—are rapidly vanishing. In Gaza, fewer than 1,000 Christians remain. Most are Orthodox; about 135 are Catholic. Despite their small numbers, their churches and schools serve as places of refuge, charity, and hope—not just for fellow Christians, but for Muslim neighbors and all civilians caught in the crossfire.

On July 17, 2025, tragedy struck the Holy Family Catholic Church in Gaza, the only Catholic parish in the entire territory. An Israeli tank shell hit the church compound, killing three civilians and injuring at least ten others, including the parish priest, Fr. Gabriel Romanelli. Weeks earlier, 18 civilians sheltering at the Greek Orthodox Church of Saint Porphyrius were killed in an airstrike.

These are not isolated incidents. They are part of a broader pattern of devastation that includes homes, hospitals, and places of worship. Despite Israeli government claims that these strikes were accidental, the damage is deep—both materially and spiritually.


🕊️ A Catholic Call for Peace, Justice, and Human Dignity

The Vatican, joined by Catholic bishops and clergy worldwide, has condemned the violence against Christian sites and called for an immediate ceasefire, unfettered humanitarian access, and respect for sacred spaces. Pope Leo XIV has made repeated appeals for compassion and peace, stating that no military objective can justify the killing of civilians or the destruction of churches.

And he’s right. Our Catholic faith, rooted in the teachings of Christ, demands the protection of the innocent—regardless of religion, race, or nationality. The Catechism of the Catholic Church reminds us that “those who are sworn to serve their country in the armed forces are servants of the security and freedom of nations. If they carry out their duty honorably, they truly contribute to the common good of the nation and the maintenance of peace” (CCC 2310). But when war ceases to serve justice and instead sows terror, starvation, or ethnic hostility, it becomes not a defense—but an offense against God.


⚖️ Holding Israel Accountable: Not Antisemitism, But Moral Clarity

Let me be clear: criticizing the Israeli government is not antisemitism.

Israel, like every other nation, has a right to exist in peace. But also like every other nation, its government is subject to moral scrutiny. As Catholics, we believe in the dignity of every human life—Jew, Christian, Muslim, believer or non-believer. And when a nation violates that dignity—especially on a massive scale—it is not only our right, but our Christian duty, to speak out.

Many international observers—including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and even some Israeli human rights groups—have raised alarms about potential war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and collective punishment of Gaza civilians. When churches are bombed, hospitals destroyed, and civilians starved by siege, these are not unfortunate side effects. They are violations of international law—and of divine law.


🔥 Settler Violence and Passive Complicity

The growing violence in the West Bank is also a tragedy that cannot be ignored. In recent months, Jewish settlers have attacked Palestinian Christians, vandalized churches, and torched homes with little to no consequence. In the Christian village of Taybeh, the historic Church of Saint George was partially burned in an arson attack.

The United States officially labeled the settler violence as acts of terrorism. And yet, the Israeli government has largely failed to prosecute or even restrain the perpetrators. Some believe this amounts to passive support—a tacit green light by failing to stop or punish crimes against Palestinian Christians and Muslims alike. It raises the disturbing question: Is Israel willing to protect Christian lives and churches, or are these sacred sites considered expendable collateral?


Global Responses: Condemnations and Calls for Accountability

The bombing of the Catholic Church in Gaza sparked outrage not only in the Vatican but across the international community:

  • Former U.S. President Donald Trump personally called Prime Minister Netanyahu to express his shock and demand accountability.

  • U.S. diplomats condemned settler attacks on Palestinian churches as "terrorism" and called for criminal prosecutions.

  • Leaders from Italy, Spain, Ireland, and the United Nations have demanded a ceasefire and humanitarian relief for Gaza civilians.

  • Catholic bishops from the U.S. and Europe have launched appeals and sent aid to Christian communities still clinging to life in the Holy Land.


🕯️ My Catholic Perspective

As a Catholic, I believe Israel is a nation like any other nation. Its historical significance as the land of Jesus is immense. Its role as steward of the Christian Holy Sites is vital. But it has no theological importance in and of itself—certainly not in terms of divine authority or moral exemption. The promises of God are fulfilled in Christ, and in the Church He established.

That means Israel’s government, like every government, must be held to the standard of justice, mercy, and the protection of human life. No nation—Jewish, Christian, Muslim, or secular—is above moral accountability. To criticize a government’s policies is not to hate a people. Rather, it is to love the truth, to defend the innocent, and to walk in the footsteps of Christ, who spoke truth to power—even when it cost Him His life.

Today, that means standing with Palestinian Christians, many of whom are suffering not for what they’ve done, but for who they are and where they live. It means defending their churches, amplifying their voices, and refusing to look away when the bombs fall on their homes and altars.


🙏 Final Word

We are called to be ambassadors of reconciliation in a broken world (2 Corinthians 5:20). That means standing between warring factions, defending the truth, and never forgetting the human faces behind the headlines.

May the God of peace bring justice to the Holy Land.
May Christian churches never again be targets of war.
May love overcome hatred, and truth silence propaganda.
And may the innocent—whatever their religion—be protected, cherished, and restored.


Chris M. Forte is a Catholic writer and editor based in San Diego’s Little Italy. He writes on faith, history, and justice, always with an eye toward the Gospel.

Wednesday, July 9, 2025

Tuam and the Catholic Faith: How Should a Devout Catholic Respond?

 


Tuam and the Catholic Faith: How Should a Devout Catholic Respond?



💔 A Wound in Our History

The revelations surrounding the Tuam Mother and Baby Home in Ireland have caused pain, sorrow, and scandal—not only in Ireland but around the Catholic world. As a devout Catholic, I’ve wrestled with the horror and confusion of this story. Learning that hundreds of children died—some possibly buried in a disused septic system on Church-run grounds—shakes you to the core.

Some argue that these tragedies discredit the Church. But as painful as Tuam is, I believe it does not disprove our faith. Instead, it calls us to a deeper understanding of what the Church is, and who we are called to be as followers of Christ.


🧎‍♂️ 1. Sin Does Not Disprove Truth

Throughout Church history, saints and sinners have walked the same corridors. The failings of clergy, religious, and laypeople—even when grave—do not change the fact that Jesus Christ founded the Church and entrusted it with the fullness of truth and grace.

“Do you also want to leave?” Simon Peter answered him, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life.”
—John 6:67–68

What happened at Tuam was not a failure of Catholic teaching. It was a failure to live that teaching—a betrayal of the very Gospel the Church proclaims.


⚖️ 2. What Happened Was Wrong—Period

Yes, the cultural attitudes in mid-20th century Ireland were deeply harsh, and the State bears significant responsibility. But the Church should have risen above that cruelty, not enforced it.

Instead of mercy, many unwed mothers received shame. Instead of protection, many children received neglect. This is not the heart of Christ. And we must say so clearly, as Catholics.

“The Church must always be reformed.”
—St. Augustine


✝️ 3. This Calls for Purification, Not Abandonment

Our faith is not in priests or religious orders, but in Jesus Christ, who is both merciful Judge and suffering Servant. The sins at Tuam—and elsewhere—are not reasons to leave the Church. They are reasons to stay, pray, and help purify it.

“Those whom I love, I reprove and discipline; so be zealous and repent.”
—Revelation 3:19


🙏 4. How Should a Catholic Respond?

Here are four ways we can respond with faith, compassion, and integrity:

1. Pray for the victims

Offer Mass intentions, Rosaries, and chaplets for the children and mothers who suffered.

2. Seek and speak the truth

Avoid denial or defensiveness. The truth must be faced in full light, not in fear.

3. Support accountability

Call for proper memorials, investigations, and reforms—out of love for the Church and the dignity of every person.

4. Live the Gospel

We must become the kind of Church where the vulnerable are safe, and where the love of Christ is unmistakable.


📖 Suggested Scripture Readings

These passages offer spiritual guidance in a time of sorrow, repentance, and renewed commitment to justice:

  • Psalm 34:18“The Lord is near to the brokenhearted, and saves the crushed in spirit.”

  • Micah 6:8“What does the Lord require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?”

  • Luke 17:1–3“Temptations to sin are sure to come, but woe to the one through whom they come…”

  • James 1:27“Religion that is pure and undefiled before God the Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction…”

  • Romans 12:21“Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.”


🕯️ A Prayer for Healing and Justice

**Lord Jesus Christ, Good Shepherd and Righteous Judge,
We cry out to You with sorrow and shame for the sins committed in Your name.
We pray for the children who died without love, the mothers who suffered in silence,
And the countless souls wounded by cruelty and neglect.

Send Your Holy Spirit to heal what is broken,
To purify Your Church, and to raise up saints who live the Gospel in full.
Make us humble, truthful, and compassionate servants of Your Kingdom.

May those who were forgotten on earth be honored in heaven.
May justice be done, and mercy overflow.
Amen.**


🔗 Helpful Sources and Links

Here are reliable resources to explore the history, context, and Church responses:


✝️ Final Words: Why I Still Believe

I don’t believe in the Church because its members are perfect. I believe in the Church because Jesus is perfect, and He chose to dwell in this broken, human body—just as He chose to be born in a stable and crucified on a cross.

The scandal at Tuam does not destroy my faith. It refines it. It purifies it. And it drives me back to the only one who can make all things new: Jesus Christ.

“Behold, I am making all things new.”
—Revelation 21:5


If this touched your heart, please share it, or leave a comment below. Let’s be a Church that listens, repents, and rebuilds.

______________________________________

Another perspective:

The tragedy at Tuam, a small town in County Galway, Ireland, is one of the most emotionally and politically charged controversies involving the Catholic Church in recent decades. It involves allegations that hundreds of children who died in a Catholic-run mother and baby home were buried in a septic tank or mass grave. The story is complex, and it's important to separate verifiable facts, serious concerns, and misconceptions or exaggerations. Below is a clear breakdown of what is known, what is alleged, and how different perspectives interpret it.


🧱 Background: The Tuam Mother and Baby Home (1925–1961)

  • Operated by the Bon Secours Sisters, a Catholic religious order.

  • Served as a home for unmarried mothers and their children, at a time when having a child outside of marriage in Ireland was heavily stigmatized—both socially and legally.

  • The institution was part of a broader network of Mother and Baby Homes supported or tolerated by the Irish government and society.


🕯️ What Sparked the Controversy?

In 2014, local historian Catherine Corless published research showing that 796 children had died at the Tuam home between 1925 and 1961, based on death certificates she uncovered.

However, no burial records were found for most of these children.

Corless also connected this data with oral testimony and maps, suggesting that many of the children were buried on the property, including possibly in a former sewage or septic system that had been unused.

The media picked up on this and some headlines declared:

800 babies found in septic tank”—sparking global outrage.


🔍 What the 2021 Commission Report Found

The Irish government launched the Mother and Baby Homes Commission of Investigation, which reported in January 2021. Its findings were extensive and nuanced.

✅ Key Confirmed Findings:

  • 802 children died at Tuam between 1925–1961.

  • Most died from disease, particularly measles, tuberculosis, and malnutrition.

  • A structure containing human remains was discovered on the site in 2016 during preliminary excavation. It was an underground chamber, part of a former sewage system, with commingled remains of children, mostly from the 1950s.

  • The site was not maintained as a formal burial ground, and no individual graves or markers were provided.

⚠️ What Was Not Proven:

  • There is no evidence that children were murdered or intentionally disposed of in the septic system as a form of abuse or cover-up.

  • The commission did not confirm that all 800 children were buried in the same place, or that the septic system was in active use at the time of the burials.

  • There was no indication of trafficking or illegal adoption at Tuam specifically, though these issues arose in other homes.


🗣️ Differing Perspectives

1. Critics and Human Rights Advocates

  • Say the treatment of unwed mothers and their children in these homes was inhumane and cruel, regardless of legal definitions.

  • Argue that the Church operated in an authoritarian moral culture, where poor and vulnerable women were shamed, punished, and often separated from their babies.

  • View the unmarked mass grave as symbolic of a systemic disregard for the dignity of the children.

“These were not just failings of the Church but of the entire society—including the state.”
—Irish Taoiseach Micheál Martin, 2021

2. The Catholic Church’s Response

  • The Bon Secours Sisters apologized for the conditions and expressed sorrow for the suffering of mothers and children.

  • The Church acknowledges that harsh moral judgment and lack of compassion marked much of its institutional response during that period.

  • However, it also calls for historical balance—reminding the public that the homes were part of a broader state-sanctioned system, reflecting the mores of Irish society at the time.

“We did not live up to our Christianity... and for that we are truly sorry.”
—Archbishop of Tuam, 2021

3. Scholarly and Cautious Voices

  • Emphasize that media narratives (e.g., “babies in septic tanks”) can sensationalize real tragedies and cloud public understanding.

  • Note that while the burial site is highly improper by today’s standards, it was not unheard of in poor institutions during earlier eras.

  • Call for respectful investigation, DNA testing, and appropriate memorialization, rather than politicization.


🧭 Summary of What We Know and Don’t Know

ClaimStatus
796–802 children died at Tuam✅ Confirmed by death records
Most died of disease and malnutrition✅ Confirmed
Children buried in unmarked graves✅ Confirmed
Bodies buried in a former septic system✅ Likely, at least in part
Children were murdered or dumped like trash❌ Not supported by evidence
All 800 children buried in the tank❌ No supporting proof
Church and State collaborated in a harsh system✅ Historically accurate
Entirely the Church’s responsibility❌ Irish government and public shared blame

🕊️ A Catholic Reflection

From a Catholic perspective, the Tuam case is a moment of sorrow, repentance, and reflection. Even if no one was “murdered,” the lack of dignity, the stigmatization of women, and the neglect of innocent children are grave moral failures.

The Gospel demands we care for “the least of these.” That includes unborn children, poor women, unwed mothers, and the sick. The Tuam tragedy shows what can happen when religion is twisted into control, rather than lived as love.

Today, the Catholic Church in Ireland and worldwide is undergoing a painful process of reckoning—not to erase history, but to heal it.


🙏 Final Thought

Tuam is not a hoax. But it’s also not what the most extreme headlines claimed.

It’s a tragic chapter in Ireland’s past, one that calls for honesty, justice, and mercy. The full truth is not served by denial or distortion.

Let the children be remembered. Let the mothers be honored. And let us ensure that nothing like it ever happens again.

Thursday, July 3, 2025

Who was Melchizedek?

 


Melchizedek: Priest of the Most High God, Type of Christ, and Bridge Between Covenants

A Chicago-Style Academic Essay from a Catholic Perspective

By Chris M. Forte


Introduction

Few biblical figures exert an influence as profound as Melchizedek while remaining described in so few words. His sudden appearance in Genesis 14—blessing Abram and offering bread and wine—has inspired centuries of interpretation across Judaism, Christianity, and later apocalyptic traditions. As a Catholic, the more I have studied Melchizedek, the more I see in him a mysterious prefiguration of Christ Himself: a king of righteousness, a priest of the Most High God, and a symbol of the eternal priesthood in which the Catholic Church claims participation. His priestly offering foreshadows the Eucharist, his kingship recalls Christ’s royal identity, and his genealogical silence reflects a heavenly order the Letter to the Hebrews boldly identifies with Christ’s eternal priesthood.

This paper surveys Melchizedek’s portrayal in Scripture, Jewish tradition, Second Temple literature, early Christian writings, the Catholic theological tradition, and modern scholarship—while also integrating my own Catholic perspective, which sees in Melchizedek a powerful witness to the unity of Scripture, the continuity of priesthood, and the Eucharistic identity of the Church.

Abstract

This paper explores the biblical figure of Melchizedek across the full spectrum of ancient Jewish, Christian, and modern scholarly interpretation, with particular attention to his enduring significance in Catholic theology. Beginning with his brief yet theologically rich introduction in Genesis 14 and the royal-priestly declaration of Psalm 110, the study traces Melchizedek’s development in Second Temple Judaism—including his striking portrayal as a heavenly, eschatological liberator in 11QMelchizedek—and demonstrates how these traditions illuminate the Letter to the Hebrews’ claim that Christ is “a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek.” Early Christian writers consistently viewed Melchizedek as a type of Christ and a prefiguration of the Eucharistic offering of bread and wine, a theme later formalized in Catholic liturgy and doctrine. Drawing on patristic sources, Qumran texts, archaeological data, and contemporary biblical scholarship, I argue from my perspective as a Catholic that Melchizedek functions as a theological bridge linking the Old and New Covenants: a figure whose priesthood anticipates Christ’s eternal priesthood and whose offering foreshadows the Eucharist. Melchizedek thus stands as a luminous witness to the unity of Scripture and the sacramental identity of the Church.


I. Melchizedek in the Hebrew Bible

Genesis 14: Priest and King

Melchizedek’s first appearance is abrupt:

“And Melchizedek king of Salem brought out bread and wine; he was priest of God Most High” (Gen. 14:18).

The passage describes him performing three actions: offering bread and wine, blessing Abram, and receiving a tithe. His dual identity—king of Salem and priest of ’El Elyon—sets him apart in the narrative world of Genesis. Many scholars identify Salem with ancient Jerusalem based on Psalm 76:2.¹ The name “Melchizedek” is typically interpreted as “king of righteousness,” the city “Salem” as “peace.”²

In the Hebrew Bible, no genealogy is provided. This silence becomes crucial later in the theological imagination.

Psalm 110:4—A Royal Priesthood

Psalm 110 announces:

“You are a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek.”

In its original context, the psalm refers to the Davidic king, presenting him as possessing an older, more universal priesthood than the Aaronic line.³ As a Catholic, I recognize this psalm as a key hinge text: it connects a pre-Israelite priesthood with David, and through David, ultimately with Christ.


II. Melchizedek in Second Temple Judaism

Rabbinic Interpretations

Rabbinic Judaism—attempting to understand this enigmatic figure—often identifies Melchizedek with Shem, son of Noah.⁴ This identification explains his great age and monotheistic priesthood. Some rabbinic sources argue Melchizedek forfeited the priesthood because he blessed Abraham before blessing God.⁵ This tradition safeguards the primacy of the Aaronic priesthood and frames Melchizedek as righteous but surpassed.

Qumran and 11QMelchizedek

The most dramatic development appears in the Dead Sea Scrolls, especially 11QMelchizedek (11Q13). In this text, Melchizedek becomes:

  • a heavenly eschatological figure,

  • associated with atonement,

  • a liberator who proclaims Jubilee,

  • and even a conqueror of Belial (Satan).⁶

Some scholars identify him with the archangel Michael; others see him as a messianic high priest.⁷ As a Catholic reader, I find this fascinating—not because I accept Melchizedek as an angel, but because it shows the conceptual space in Judaism for a heavenly, eternal priesthood later fulfilled in Christ.


III. Melchizedek in the New Testament

The Letter to the Hebrews

Hebrews offers the most extensive Christian interpretation:

  • Christ is “a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek” (Heb. 5:6; 6:20; 7:17).

  • Melchizedek’s name (“king of righteousness”) and city (“peace”) prefigure Christ’s identity.⁸

  • His genealogy is omitted so that he can resemble one who has “neither beginning of days nor end of life,” a literary depiction of eternal priesthood.⁹

The argument is clear: Christ fulfills—rather than replaces—the Melchizedekian priesthood, revealing its true meaning.

As a Catholic, this is crucial for understanding why Christ can be both king and priest without being a Levite, and why the Catholic priesthood is rooted not in bloodline but in Christ’s eternal priesthood.


IV. Melchizedek in Early Christianity

Patristic Interpretations

Early Christian writers unanimously read Melchizedek as a type of Christ:

  • Origen saw him as symbolizing the divine Logos and the heavenly priesthood.¹⁰

  • Ambrose linked Melchizedek’s bread and wine directly to the Eucharistic sacrifice.¹¹

  • Clement of Alexandria emphasized Melchizedek’s role in revealing a universal priesthood prior to the Law.¹²

A few fringe groups (e.g., Melchizedekians) elevated Melchizedek above Christ; the Great Church condemned these movements as heretical.¹³

Melchizedek and the Eucharist

The Fathers consistently interpreted Melchizedek’s offering as a prefiguration of the Eucharist—a connection deeply embedded in Catholic liturgy. The Roman Canon explicitly references “the offering of your high priest Melchizedek.”

As a Catholic, I see this as profound: the earliest Eucharistic theology ties the Mass not merely to Passover but to the primordial priesthood that blessed Abraham.


V. Melchizedek in Catholic Theology

The Catechism

The Catechism of the Catholic Church affirms:

“The Church sees in the gesture of the king-priest Melchizedek, who ‘brought out bread and wine,’ a prefiguring of the Eucharist.”¹⁴

And regarding the priesthood:

“Christ is the source of all priesthood.”¹⁵

Catholic teaching therefore views Melchizedek as:

  1. a real historical priest-king,

  2. a typological foreshadowing of Christ,

  3. the figure through whom Scripture explains Christ’s eternal priesthood,

  4. and an anticipatory image of the Eucharistic sacrifice.

My Perspective as a Catholic

For me, Melchizedek embodies the deep unity of Scripture—the way the Old Testament points beyond itself. He is a reminder that God planted signs of the New Covenant long before Sinai or the Levites.

Melchizedek also helps me understand the Eucharist not simply as a ritual meal, but as the universal offering of bread and wine foreshadowed at history’s dawn. And he explains why Catholic priesthood is not reducible to Old Testament categories: it participates not in an earthly genealogy but in Christ’s eternal priesthood “according to the order of Melchizedek.”


VI. Archaeology and Historical Context

Archaeology has not identified an inscription naming Melchizedek, but it does support the broader picture:

  • Ancient Jerusalem was ruled by royal priest-kings during the Late Bronze Age.¹⁶

  • The title ’El Elyon (God Most High) corresponds to names used in pre-Israelite Canaanite religion and aligns with early monotheistic titles.¹⁷

Thus, Melchizedek fits the historical patterns of a pre-Israelite Jerusalemite priest-king who worshipped the High God and recognized Abram.


Conclusion

Melchizedek stands at the crossroads of biblical theology. He bridges Gentile and Jew, Abraham and David, priesthood and kingship, Old Covenant and New. In my Catholic understanding, his life and priesthood illuminate Christ’s identity as eternal high priest, the Eucharist as the true offering of bread and wine, and the Catholic priest’s sacramental participation in Christ’s heavenly ministry.

Melchizedek appears briefly—but like a flash of lightning, he illuminates the entire biblical landscape.


Footnotes

  1. John Day, God’s Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 91.

  2. William L. Lane, Hebrews 1–8 (Word Biblical Commentary 47A; Dallas: Word, 1991), 162.

  3. Frank Moore Cross, “The Council of Yahweh in Second Isaiah,” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 12 (1953): 274–277.

  4. Babylonian Talmud, Nedarim 32b.

  5. Genesis Rabbah 43:6.

  6. Florentino García Martínez and Eibert J. C. Tigchelaar, The Dead Sea Scrolls Study Edition, vol. 2 (Leiden: Brill, 1997), 1209–1213.

  7. Geza Vermes, The Dead Sea Scrolls in English, 5th ed. (London: Penguin, 2011), 532–533.

  8. Heb. 7:2; Lane, Hebrews, 165–166.

  9. Harold W. Attridge, The Epistle to the Hebrews (Hermeneia; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1989), 189–195.

  10. Origen, Homilies on Genesis, trans. Ronald Heine (Washington, D.C.: CUA Press, 1982), Hom. 16.

  11. Ambrose, De Sacramentis 4.3.

  12. Clement of Alexandria, Stromata 4.25.

  13. Epiphanius, Panarion 55.

  14. Catechism of the Catholic Church (1992), §1333.

  15. Catechism, §1548.

  16. Kathleen Kenyon, Jerusalem: Excavating 3000 Years of History (New York: McGraw Hill, 1967), 41–44.

  17. Mark S. Smith, The Early History of God: Yahweh and the Other Deities in Ancient Israel (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002), 32–34.


Bibliography

Ambrose. De Sacramentis.
Attridge, Harold W. The Epistle to the Hebrews. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1989.
Clement of Alexandria. Stromata.
Cross, Frank Moore. “The Council of Yahweh in Second Isaiah.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 12 (1953): 274–277.
García Martínez, Florentino, and Eibert Tigchelaar. The Dead Sea Scrolls Study Edition. Leiden: Brill, 1997.
Kenyon, Kathleen. Jerusalem: Excavating 3000 Years of History. New York: McGraw Hill, 1967.
Lane, William L. Hebrews 1–8. Word Biblical Commentary 47A. Dallas: Word, 1991.
Origen. Homilies on Genesis. Washington, D.C.: CUA Press, 1982.
Smith, Mark S. The Early History of God. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002.
Talmud Bavli. Nedarim 32b.
Vermes, Geza. The Dead Sea Scrolls in English. London: Penguin, 2011.
*The Catechism of the Catholic Church. Vatican City, 1992.