Video courtesy of Radiant Bible at Radiant Bible - YouTube
Both Scripture and Tradition (because as Catholics, we don’t subscribe to "Scripture alone") clearly show that Jesus, the Apostles, and the earliest Christians were observant Jews. So why aren’t we, as Catholic Christians, "Jewish"? If the first followers of Christ kept the Torah and observed Jewish customs, how did Christianity come to teach that Judaism was "fulfilled" and replaced by a New Covenant that frees us from the Mosaic Law and Jewish traditions? How did the Jewish expression of Christianity come to be labeled a "heresy"?
As both a Catholic and a student of history, I found myself grappling with these questions. But I believe I’ve uncovered the answer. So, let’s dive into this extraordinary transformation—how the Church evolved from its Jewish roots to become the universal faith we know today. Let’s explore why we are Catholic Christians, why we are no longer bound by the Torah, and why we are members of the temporal Kingdom of God on Earth: the Catholic Church.
From the Nazarenes to the Rise of Gentile Christianity: The Transformation of the Early Church and the Establishment of Papal Supremacy
The history of early Christianity is a narrative of profound transitions, marked by its beginnings as a Jewish sect and its evolution into a predominantly Gentile faith. Central to this transformation is the role of the Nazarenes, the original Jewish-Christian community based in Jerusalem and led by Jesus' family, particularly his brother James the Just. Over time, leadership shifted to Gentile Christians, culminating in the establishment of the Catholic Church, centered in Rome. As Christianity spread, the Popes gradually asserted their supremacy, and Constantine's embrace of Christianity introduced new theological interpretations of the Church’s role in the world.
Jesus and the Nazarenes: A Kingdom of God on Earth
Some scholars argue that Jesus envisioned a literal Kingdom of God on Earth, starting with his family. James Tabor, in his book The Jesus Dynasty, asserts that Jesus' earliest followers, including James, were deeply committed to a Jewish understanding of the Messiah's role in establishing God’s rule on Earth. Tabor writes:
"The Jesus movement began as a distinctly Jewish sect, led by Jesus' brother James, who assumed leadership after Jesus' death. This leadership was based not only on spiritual authority but also on familial lineage." (The Jesus Dynasty, p. 275).
The Nazarenes, the first Christian community, continued to practice Jewish customs such as observing the Torah, keeping the Sabbath, and worshiping in the Temple. They believed Jesus fulfilled Jewish prophecy as the Messiah but did not see his mission as abolishing Jewish law.
The leader of this movement, James the Just, held a position of great respect among Jews and Christians alike. Eusebius of Caesarea, quoting Hegesippus, describes James as a devout Jew known for his piety:
"He was in the habit of entering alone into the Temple and was frequently found upon his knees begging forgiveness for the people." (Ecclesiastical History, 2.23).
James’ leadership was so influential that even non-Christian Jews revered him, as Josephus notes in Antiquities of the Jews (20.9.1), where James is described as the "brother of Jesus, who was called the Christ."
What Did the Early Church Fathers Say About the Nazarenes?
The Nazarenes were a distinct group within early Christianity, maintaining Jewish customs while believing in Jesus as the Messiah. Several Church Fathers commented on the Nazarenes, often reflecting the tension between Jewish-Christian groups and the emerging Gentile Church:
Epiphanius of Salamis:
In Panarion, Epiphanius provides detailed descriptions of the Nazarenes. He distinguishes them from other Jewish-Christian groups, like the Ebionites, but criticizes them for continuing to observe the Law:
"They are Jews who pay honor to Christ as a righteous man and use the Gospel according to Matthew only. They are fettered by the Law—circumcision, the Sabbath, and the other Jewish rites."
Epiphanius recognized the Nazarenes' belief in Christ but saw their adherence to Jewish practices as incompatible with the emerging Gentile Christian orthodoxy.
Jerome:
Jerome, in his commentary on Isaiah, notes the Nazarenes' unique position, describing them as Jewish Christians who did not abandon the Mosaic Law:
"The Nazarenes… accept Messiah in such a way that they do not cease to observe the old Law."
Jerome’s writings reveal the tension between Jewish and Gentile expressions of Christianity, with Gentile Christians increasingly viewing Jewish practices as unnecessary under the New Covenant.
Augustine of Hippo:
While Augustine does not focus directly on the Nazarenes, his theology emphasizes the transition from the Old Covenant to the New Covenant, which aligns with the Gentile Christian perspective. In The City of God, Augustine writes:
"The old law is fulfilled in Christ, who has established a new and eternal covenant with His people, uniting Jew and Gentile in one Church."
The Role of the Desposyni in the Early Church
The term "Desposyni" refers to the family members of Jesus, particularly those descended from his brothers and relatives. Hegesippus, as preserved in the writings of Eusebius, describes the Desposyni as key figures in the leadership of the early Jerusalem Church, continuing the dynastic leadership established by James the Just.
Hegesippus writes:
"There were still living of the family of the Lord grandsons of Jude, who is said to have been His brother according to the flesh." (Ecclesiastical History, 3.19.1)
The Desposyni were seen as custodians of the original Jewish-Christian tradition, adhering to the Torah and maintaining a vision of Christianity closely tied to its Jewish roots. They held positions of leadership in the Jerusalem Church until its decline following the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD and the Bar-Kokhba revolt (132–135 AD).
The Orthodox Patriarchate of Jerusalem acknowledges this dynastic aspect of the early Church, stating:
"The first fifteen bishops of Jerusalem were of Jewish origin, beginning with James the Just. After the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD and the subsequent Bar-Kokhba revolt, the leadership transitioned to Gentiles." (Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Jerusalem)
Emperor Domitian’s interaction with the Desposyni further underscores their diminished influence. According to Hegesippus, Domitian summoned the grandsons of Jude (Jesus' brother) to question them, suspecting them of political ambitions. However, upon discovering that they were simple farmers with no aspirations of rebellion or rulership, Domitian dismissed them as harmless. Hegesippus recounts:
"When they were asked about Christ and His kingdom, they explained that it was a heavenly kingdom, not an earthly one, and spoke of their humble lifestyle. Domitian, seeing their simplicity, dismissed them." (Ecclesiastical History, 3.20.6-7)
Despite Domitian’s dismissal, the Desposyni continued to play roles of leadership within certain Christian communities. Their adherence to Jewish customs and teachings ensured that they remained influential among Jewish-Christian groups even as Gentile Christianity began to dominate the broader movement.
The Apocalyptic Nature of the Early Jesus Movement
The earliest followers of Jesus, including the Nazarenes and the Desposyni, were deeply apocalyptic in their outlook. They believed that Jesus’ resurrection was the first step in the imminent establishment of God’s Kingdom on Earth. This belief is reflected in the writings of the Apostles and early Church leaders. For example, Paul writes in 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17:
"For the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a cry of command, with the voice of an archangel, and with the sound of the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we will always be with the Lord."
This expectation of Jesus’ imminent return likely shaped the early Church’s structure and priorities. As time passed and the Second Coming did not occur, the Church began to shift its focus from apocalyptic urgency to building a sustainable institution. This transition may have further marginalized the Nazarenes and the Desposyni, who maintained their apocalyptic outlook for a longer period.
A Note About the Desposyni: Tracing the Bloodline: The Legacy of Jesus' Family in Early Christianity"
As I’ve delved into the history of early Christianity, I’ve found fascinating yet sporadic reports that hint at the existence of descendants of Jesus' brothers, extending into at least the mid-third century. These accounts not only highlight their presence but also their potential roles within the early Church, offering us a glimpse of how the Desposyni—Jesus' relatives "according to the flesh"—may have contributed to the faith's formative years.
Julius Africanus (d. ca. 240) provides one of the earliest mentions of Jesus’ relatives, using the term Desposyni to describe "the relatives of Jesus according to the flesh." He noted that they lived in Galilean towns and were aware of their revered lineage. This acknowledgment of their genealogy speaks to the unique position they held within the early Christian community.
There is also the intriguing story of Zoker and James, two grandsons of Jude (a brother of Jesus), who were humble farmers and church leaders in the early second century. And as mentioned above, Eusebius of Caesarea, quoting Hegesippus, recounts how these grandsons were summoned by Emperor Domitian, who suspected them of political ambitions due to their family ties to Christ. Upon discovering their simple lifestyle and focus on a heavenly kingdom rather than an earthly one, Domitian dismissed them as harmless. Despite this, they returned to leadership roles within the Church, signifying the respect they still commanded.
Another fascinating account comes from Eusebius and Epiphanius, who mention Judah the Kyriakos, the last Jewish bishop of Jerusalem in the second century. According to their writings, Judah was the great-grandson of Jude, further reinforcing the idea that the leadership of the Jerusalem Church remained tied to Jesus’ family lineage for several generations.
The chronicle of the bishops of Mesopotamia offers yet another clue. It references two Christian leaders, Abraham and his son James, who were reportedly descendants of James, the brother of Jesus. This suggests that Jesus' relatives may have played significant roles not just in Jerusalem but in other Christian communities as well.
Lastly, there’s the testimony of Conon, a Christian martyr from the mid-third century. According to the Acts of Conon, he introduced himself as being from Nazareth and part of the family of Christ. This remarkable claim, even in the context of hagiography, underscores the continued reverence for Jesus’ lineage within certain Christian circles.
The Catholic Perspective on the Family of Jesus
From the Catholic perspective, these historical accounts are fascinating but must be approached with nuance, particularly regarding their theological implications. The Church holds to the perpetual virginity of Mary, a belief affirmed by early Church Fathers like Jerome. This doctrine teaches that Jesus had no biological siblings in the literal sense but that the "brothers" and "sisters" of Jesus mentioned in Scripture were either close relatives (cousins) or step-siblings from a prior marriage of Joseph, as suggested by some ancient traditions.
This interpretation aligns with Catholic teaching that while Jesus’ familial relatives, such as James and Jude, were significant figures in the early Church, their importance was not due to blood relation alone. Instead, Catholic theology emphasizes that true kinship with Jesus is based on spiritual obedience to God. As Jesus Himself said in Matthew 12:50:
"For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother."
The Catholic Church has consistently taught that leadership in the Church is based not on familial ties but on Apostolic succession. While the Desposyni may have been respected for their connection to Jesus, the Church views authority as derived from Christ’s appointment of the Apostles, particularly Peter, as the foundation of the Church (Matthew 16:18-19). This is why leadership transitioned from the Jerusalem Church, led by the Desposyni, to the broader Gentile Church centered in Rome, guided by successors of the Apostles.
Additionally, the Catholic Church emphasizes that the focus of the faith should not rest on earthly genealogies but on the spiritual mission of salvation. St. Paul echoed this sentiment in Galatians 3:28:
"There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus."
This teaching suggests that while Jesus’ relatives were undoubtedly important figures in the early Church, their role was secondary to the universal mission of the Gospel, which transcends bloodlines.
Balancing the Historical and Theological Perspectives
These scattered pieces of evidence about the Desposyni, though not conclusive, paint a compelling picture of their presence and influence within early Christianity. Their saintly and priestly roles, particularly in the Jerusalem Church, deserve recognition. However, the Catholic perspective reminds us that leadership in the Church is not rooted in familial ties but in the spiritual authority granted by Christ to the Apostles and their successors.
This dynamic underscores the broader transformation of early Christianity. What began as a movement centered on the Jerusalem Church and its Jewish-Christian roots eventually expanded into a universal faith—Catholic in its truest sense. This shift allowed the Church to transcend cultural and genealogical boundaries, fulfilling Christ’s command to "make disciples of all nations" (Matthew 28:19).
The legacy of the Desposyni, therefore, is an essential part of the Church’s history but serves as a reminder that the mission of Christianity is not about lineage but about living as true disciples of Christ, united in faith and purpose.
Gradual Abandonment of the Torah
There is a theory, supported by some scholars, that the Apostles—though practicing Jews themselves—gradually introduced the teaching that faith in Christ brought freedom from the Torah and Jewish customs. This gradual approach may have been strategic, as openly abolishing Jewish law would have alienated their fellow Jews. This perspective is summarized in the Catholic Encyclopedia:
"The Mosaic ceremonial law was not to be permanent indeed, but the time had not yet come for abolishing its observance. The intense attachment which the Jews had for it, amounting to fanaticism in the case of the Pharisees, would have forbidden such a step, had the Apostles contemplated it, as it would have been tantamount to shutting the door of the Church to the Jews." (Catholic Encyclopedia: Judaizers)
This theory suggests that the full expression of the Church’s freedom from the Mosaic Law became evident only after Gentiles outnumbered Jews in the Christian movement.
St. Paul’s letters strongly support this view of freedom from the Law, particularly for Gentile Christians. In Galatians 5:1-3, Paul writes:
"For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery. Look: I, Paul, say to you that if you accept circumcision, Christ will be of no advantage to you."
Paul also condemned the influence of the Judaizers, as seen in his confrontation with Peter in Galatians 2:11-14, when Peter separated himself from Gentile believers under pressure from those who adhered to Jewish customs. This theological divide between Jewish and Gentile Christians reflects the growing shift toward a hybrid faith.
Peter’s Role in the Early Church
Peter was undeniably a central figure in the early Church, recognized by many as the leader of the Apostles. His actions and role reflect an authoritative presence within the burgeoning Christian community. According to Acts 5:1-11, Peter sat in a position of authority, receiving gifts from believers and holding them accountable for their honesty. This is vividly illustrated in the account of Ananias and Sapphira, who were struck down after attempting to deceive Peter and the community about their donations:
"When Ananias heard this, he fell down and died. And great fear seized all who heard what had happened." (Acts 5:5)
Peter’s leadership extended beyond Jerusalem. He preached widely and was instrumental in bringing Gentiles into the Church, as seen in Acts 10 with the conversion of Cornelius. His role as a unifying leader is reflected in his title as the "rock" upon which Jesus would build His Church (Matthew 16:18-19).
However, Peter’s leadership may have caused tension with the Desposyni and the Jerusalem Church, led by James. The Jerusalem Church emphasized adherence to the Torah and Jewish customs, a perspective that Peter initially shared. This alignment is evident in the Council of Jerusalem (Acts 15), where Peter and James agreed that Gentile converts did not need to fully observe the Mosaic Law but encouraged them to adhere to certain Jewish practices. Over time, however, Peter’s broader outreach to Gentiles and his close association with Paul’s mission may have strained his relationship with the more Torah-focused faction led by James and the Desposyni.
While the Desposyni—the family of Jesus—were revered and even held leadership positions in the early Church, their role was largely seen as honorary or symbolic. Leadership within the Christian movement was ultimately entrusted to elected leaders, who were ordained by their predecessors through a process known as Apostolic succession. This structure reflected Jesus’ emphasis on servant leadership rather than leadership based on familial relation or dynastic privilege.
After all, as recorded in Scripture, Jesus made it clear that greatness in His Kingdom was not determined by lineage but by faithful obedience and service. He taught that "those who follow His teachings" or "do the will of His Father" would be called great (Matthew 12:50). Furthermore, Jesus quelled any ambitions for hierarchical dominance among His Apostles, saying:
"Whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first must be your slave—just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many." (Matthew 20:26-28)
This focus on humility, service, and spiritual authority shaped the early Church's understanding of leadership and paved the way for the transition from dynastic ties to a more universal and inclusive system of governance through Apostolic succession.
Note: The Dual Pathways of Leadership
The early Christian movement was marked by diverse expressions of faith and leadership. While the Desposyni remained custodians of Jewish-Christian traditions, Gentile Christianity, with its emphasis on apostolic succession through figures like Peter and Paul, gained prominence. The tensions between these groups reflected broader debates over the nature of the Church, its relationship to the Mosaic Law, and its mission to the world.
Ultimately, the Desposyni's influence waned as the Church’s leadership transitioned to a universal model centered on Rome. However, their story serves as a reminder of Christianity’s Jewish origins and the diverse traditions that shaped its early history.
Note: The Rise of Gentile Christianity and Papal Authority
While the Desposyni likely governed the Church in Jerusalem during its early years, Gentile Christians established authority through Apostolic succession from Peter, Paul, and John. This shift is evident in the writings of Ignatius of Antioch. In 107 AD, Ignatius emphasized episcopal authority and coined the term "Catholic Church," highlighting the universality of the faith. In his Letter to the Smyrnaeans, he wrote:
"Wherever the bishop appears, there let the people be; as wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church."
Rome’s symbolic significance as the site of Peter and Paul’s martyrdom further bolstered the bishops of Rome’s claim to authority. This connection is rooted in Jesus’ declaration to Peter in Matthew 16:18-19:
"You are Peter, and on this rock, I will build my Church... I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven."
This Roman episcopal lineage developed while the Jesus Dynasty, centered in Jerusalem, still existed.
From Judgment to Supremacy: How the Fall of Jerusalem Shaped Gentile Christianity and Fueled Christian Antisemitism
The destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple, along with the dispersion of the Jewish people during the Jewish-Roman War and the subsequent Bar-Kokhba revolt, was seen by many Gentile Christians as a fulfillment of Biblical prophecy and a sign of divine judgment against the Jews. This interpretation was often linked to the controversial "blood libel" passage in Scripture where the crowd says, "His blood be on us and on our children" (Matthew 27:25). These events became a foundational element of Christian antisemitism.
As Gentile Christianity gradually replaced the Jewish expression of the faith, this antisemitic perspective gained prominence. Gentile Christian leaders, who legitimized their authority through Apostolic succession rather than the familial lineage of the Desposyni (the Jesus family dynasty), promoted the idea that Judaism had been "fulfilled" and effectively replaced by the New Covenant. This new theological framework emphasized freedom from the Torah and Jewish customs, presenting it as the only orthodox way of following Christ.
As a result, Jewish Christianity, represented by groups like the Nazarenes as led by the desposyni, the family of Jesus, was increasingly marginalized, labeled heretical, and eventually faded away. This decline was due to both natural assimilation into the Gentile Church and, at times, outright persecution. This shift marked the rise of a predominantly Gentile Church that distanced itself from its Jewish roots, leaving a legacy of theological and cultural separation from Judaism.
Constantine and the Fulfillment of Prophecy
The Edict of Milan in 313 AD, issued by Constantine and Licinius, legalized Christianity and marked a pivotal moment in the Church’s history. Constantine's conversion to Christianity and his subsequent patronage were seen by early Church leaders as the fulfillment of Biblical prophecy, particularly Revelation 11:15:
"The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign forever and ever."
For many Christians, Constantine’s reign represented the realization of Christ’s prayer in Matthew 6:10:
"Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done, on Earth as it is in Heaven."
This new alignment between Church and state introduced the idea that the Roman Empire itself was a divine instrument for establishing God’s rule on Earth.
Papal Supremacy in the Post-Constantinian Church
Following Constantine’s reign, the Church’s alignment with the Roman Empire bolstered the authority of the Bishop of Rome. Key developments included:
Leo the Great (440–461 AD):
Pope Leo I articulated the doctrine of Roman primacy, emphasizing the Pope’s role as Peter’s successor. At the Council of Chalcedon (451 AD), the bishops declared:"Peter has spoken through Leo."
Gregory the Great (590–604 AD):
Gregory consolidated papal authority further, promoting the Pope as both the spiritual leader of the Church and a moral authority for secular rulers.
Conclusion: The Transformation of the Early Church
The transformation of early Christianity—from the Nazarenes as led by James the Just and the desposyni, the extended family of Jesus, to the establishment of Gentile leadership under the Catholic Church—culminated in the alignment of Church and state under Constantine. Early Christians saw this as a partial fulfillment of prophecy, with the Church tasked with bringing God’s Kingdom to Earth while awaiting the Parousia.
While the Nazarenes and the desposyni faded into obscurity, the Catholic and Orthodox Churches grew into global institutions, promoting salvation and governance in line with Christian values. This dual mission—of spiritual and societal leadership—remains a hallmark of the Church’s legacy to this day.
And this is why, even though Jesus and His Apostles were Jewish, and the first Bishops of the Church were Jews, we identify as "Christians" today—followers of Christ who are no longer bound by the Torah or Jewish customs but live under the freedom of the New Covenant. This transition was both intentional and gradual, guided by the Apostles, to fulfill Jesus' command to "teach all nations" and to create an inclusive, universal faith—a Catholic Church. This Church, as the temporal Kingdom of God on Earth, prepares the way for the permanent Kingdom of God in Heaven, which will come at the Second Coming of Christ. And that is why I am Catholic.
Timeline of Christian History (Catholic Perspective)
30–33 AD: The Death and Resurrection of Jesus Christ
Jesus of Nazareth, crucified under Pontius Pilate, rises from the dead.
He establishes the Church on the Apostles:
"You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it." (Matthew 16:18)
His Resurrection and Ascension (Acts 1) mark the birth of Christianity.
30s–50s AD: The Early Church — a Jewish Movement
The earliest followers of Jesus were faithful Jews, believing He fulfilled the promises to Israel.
They worshipped in the Temple (Acts 2:46) and synagogues.
Scholar E.P. Sanders notes:
"The early community thought of itself as the faithful remnant of Israel."
2–67 AD: Peter’s Mission to Rome and the Beginning of the Papacy
According to early Christian tradition, St. Peter traveled to Rome around the early 40s AD to lead the Christian community there.
He served as its first Bishop, fulfilling Christ’s command:
"Feed my sheep." (John 21:17)
Peter was martyred under Emperor Nero (c. 64–67 AD), crucified upside down, according to tradition (Eusebius, Church History II.25).
After Peter’s death, successors took his place to continue his apostolic authority in Rome:
St. Linus (c. 67–76 AD) — mentioned in 2 Timothy 4:21.
St. Anacletus (Cletus) (c. 76–88 AD)
St. Clement I (c. 88–99 AD) — wrote an important letter (First Epistle of Clement) to the Corinthians, showing the Roman Church’s role in settling disputes in other churches.
St. Irenaeus (c. 180 AD) wrote:
"The blessed Apostles, having founded and built up the Church [of Rome], committed into the hands of Linus the office of the episcopate." (Against Heresies III.3.3)
From Peter forward, the papacy has been a continuous, visible line of apostolic succession — the foundation of unity and authority in the Catholic Church
49 AD: Council of Jerusalem — The New Covenant and Freedom from Mosaic Law
Recorded in Acts 15:
The Apostles, with Peter’s leadership, declare that Gentiles do not need to follow the Mosaic Law (i.e., circumcision, kosher food, ritual observances) to be saved.They affirm that salvation comes through Jesus Christ, not the Mosaic covenant.
"It has seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things." (Acts 15:28)
The New Covenant was prophesied in the Old Testament (Jeremiah 31:31) and fulfilled by Christ (Luke 22:20).
Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC 1965):
"The New Law is the grace of the Holy Spirit given to the faithful through faith in Christ."
This marked the first formal theological break: Christians were not bound by the Old Covenant ceremonial law.
64–70 AD: Nero’s Persecution and the Jewish-Roman War
64 AD: Nero blames Christians for Rome’s fire. Peter and Paul are martyred.
66–70 AD: The Jewish-Roman War.
70 AD: Titus destroys Jerusalem and the Second Temple.
The destruction of the Temple weakened Jewish-Christian ties; Temple-centered Jewish Christianity could no longer survive.
Church historian Jaroslav Pelikan writes:
"The fall of the Temple marked the beginning of the end of the Jewish-Christian Church."
80s–90s AD: Separation Hardens
The Birkat ha-Minim prayer added to synagogue liturgy curses "heretics" — likely including Christians.
Christians are expelled from Jewish communal life.
Gospel of John reflects the division:
"For the Jews had already agreed that if anyone confessed Jesus to be the Christ, he was to be put out of the synagogue." (John 9:22)
50s–100 AD: The New Testament is Written
Why it was written:
Preserve the apostolic teaching for future generations.
Respond to heresies, clarify true doctrine.
Support the growing Church outside Palestine.
As the first witnesses aged or were martyred, the need to record their teaching became urgent.
Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC 76) teaches:
"In keeping with the Lord’s command, the Gospel was handed on... orally and in writing."
Timeline of New Testament Writing (approximate):
50–60 AD: Paul's Letters (e.g., 1 Thessalonians, Galatians, Corinthians)
60–70 AD: Synoptic Gospels (Mark first, then Matthew and Luke)
70–90 AD: Other letters (Peter, James, John)
90–100 AD: Gospel of John and Revelation
Apostolic Authority:
St. Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 180 AD) stressed that the New Testament books were trusted because they came from the Apostles or their close associates:
"We have learned the plan of our salvation from those to whom the Gospel was handed down from the Apostles." (Against Heresies III.1.1)
100–135 AD: Gentile Church Ascends — Full Break from Jewish Identity
After the Bar Kokhba Revolt (132–135 AD), Christians who refused to support Bar Kokhba (who falsely claimed to be the Messiah) were definitively separated.
Jerusalem becomes a Roman city — Aelia Capitolina — banning Jews and Christians alike.
The Church, now largely Gentile, embraces:
The New Covenant as the fulfillment of the Old.
Freedom from ritual Mosaic customs (Galatians 5:6).
St. Ignatius of Antioch (d. 107 AD) taught:
"It is monstrous to talk of Jesus Christ and to practice Judaism. Christianity did not base its faith on Judaism, but Judaism on Christianity." (Letter to the Magnesians 10:3)
2nd–3rd Centuries: Hierarchy, Mass, and Titles Develop
Hierarchical Structure
By the early second century, local churches are organized under bishops, with priests (presbyters) and deacons serving under them.
Ignatius of Antioch emphasizes the three-fold structure:
"You must all follow the bishop, as Jesus Christ follows the Father, and the presbyters as you would the apostles." (Letter to the Smyrnaeans 8:1)
The Mass
Eucharistic celebration becomes the central act of Christian worship.
St. Justin Martyr (c. 155 AD) describes the Mass:
"On the day called Sunday, all who live in cities or in the country gather together... The memoirs of the apostles and the writings of the prophets are read." (First Apology 67)
Early Mass involved Scripture readings, prayers, offertory, Eucharistic prayer, and reception of Communion — recognizable in today’s Catholic Mass.
Vestments
Clerical vestments evolve from Roman formal dress.
Bishops, priests, and deacons wore distinct garments in worship to reflect sacred duties (see The Spirit of the Liturgy by Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger).
Title "Father"
Catholic priests began to be called "Father" to emphasize their spiritual fatherhood.
St. Paul himself uses the concept:
"For I became your father in Christ Jesus through the gospel." (1 Corinthians 4:15)
Tertullian (c. 200 AD) calls bishops "fathers" in the faith.
Title "Holy Father" for the Pope
The Bishop of Rome, successor to Peter, was affectionately and reverently called "Holy Father" — signifying both paternity and sanctity of office.
Early Christians referred to Pope Damasus I (366–384 AD) with honorific titles.
"The chair of Peter, that is, the Church, which has no spot or wrinkle." — St. Optatus of Milevis, Against the Donatists (c. 370 AD)
313 AD: Edict of Milan — Christianity Legalized
Constantine grants religious freedom.
325 AD: Council of Nicaea I
Condemns Arianism.
Issues the Nicene Creed.
Canon 6 acknowledges the authority of Rome, Alexandria, and Antioch.
367 AD: First Complete New Testament List
St. Athanasius (Festal Letter 39) gives the first list matching today's New Testament (27 books).
"These are the fountains of salvation, that whosoever thirsts may be satisfied." — Athanasius, Festal Letter 39
381 AD: Council of Constantinople I
Clarifies the divinity of the Holy Spirit.
Recognizes Constantinople's honorary primacy after Rome.
382 AD: Council of Rome — Canon Confirmed
Pope Damasus I, at the Council of Rome, lists the 27 New Testament books officially.
Decree of Damasus (382):
"Now indeed we must treat of the Divine Scriptures... [lists the full NT canon]"
393 and 397 AD: Councils of Hippo and Carthage
Two local councils reaffirm the 27-book New Testament canon.
431 AD: Council of Ephesus
Declares Mary Theotokos — Mother of God.
451 AD: Council of Chalcedon
Defines Christ as true God and true man, two natures united in one Person.
Formally establishes the Pentarchy:
Rome (Pope)
Constantinople (Patriarch)
Alexandria (Patriarch)
Antioch (Patriarch)
Jerusalem (Patriarch)
Chalcedon Canon 28 (controversial) claims Constantinople’s second-place rank after Rome because it is the imperial city.
Rome rejects this: primacy comes from Peter, not politics.
Pope Leo the Great ("Tome of Leo") emphasizes:
"Peter has spoken through Leo."
(Epistle 28)
Key Takeaways
Christianity transitioned from a Jewish sect to a universal Church by proclaiming the New Covenant, free from Mosaic ritual law.
The hierarchical structure, Mass, titles like Father and Holy Father, and clerical vestments developed naturally and theologically as the Church matured.
The Pentarchy framed the global Church’s unity under Rome’s primacy.
The New Testament was written between 50–100 AD to preserve apostolic teaching and strengthen the growing Church.
Canonization happened gradually, driven by the need to guard authentic doctrine against heresy and ensure unity.
The final Catholic canon of 27 New Testament books was ratified by the end of the 4th century — by the authority of the Church.
As St. Augustine summarized:
"I would not believe the Gospel if not for the authority of the Catholic Church." (Against the Letter of Mani 5,6)
Sources Cited
Bible — Acts, Galatians, John, Matthew, 1 Corinthians
Catechism of the Catholic Church (1992)
St. Ignatius of Antioch, Letters
St. Justin Martyr, First Apology
Tertullian, Prescription Against Heretics
E.P. Sanders, Paul and Palestinian Judaism (1977)
Jaroslav Pelikan, The Christian Tradition (1971)
Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, The Spirit of the Liturgy (2000)
Philip Jenkins, The Jesus Wars (2010)
James D.G. Dunn, The Partings of the Ways (1991)
St. Optatus of Milevis, Against the Donatists
Bible — Acts, Galatians, John, Matthew, 1 Corinthians
Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraphs 75–83, 1965
Muratorian Fragment (c. 170 AD)
St. Irenaeus, Against Heresies
St. Athanasius, Festal Letter 39
Council of Rome (382), Decree of Damasus
Councils of Hippo (393) and Carthage (397)
St. Augustine, Against the Letter of Mani
Jaroslav Pelikan, The Christian Tradition
Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, The Spirit of the Liturgy
Bible: 2 Timothy 4:21 (mentions Linus)
Eusebius, Church History, Book II, Chapter 25
St. Irenaeus, Against Heresies III.3.3
Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC 880–882, on the role of Peter and his successors)
7th–8th Centuries: Islamic Conquests and Christian Losses
Muslim armies conquer:
Jerusalem (638)
Antioch (637)
Alexandria (642)
Christian communities survive but under harsh restrictions (Dhimmi status).
Catholic West and Orthodox East begin diverging culturally, politically, and liturgically.
800 AD: Charlemagne Crowned Holy Roman Emperor
Pope Leo III crowns Charlemagne "Emperor of the Romans," restoring a Western Christian empire.
Causes resentment in the East (Byzantine Empire), which sees itself as the true continuation of Rome.
1054 AD: The Great Schism
Tensions over theology (e.g., Filioque clause), papal authority, and cultural-political differences reach breaking point.
Mutual excommunications between Rome and Constantinople formalize the split between Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy.
Both sides contributed to the division.
Pope St. John Paul II later called it:
"A tragic wound in the Body of Christ."
1095–1291 AD: The Crusades
Why the Crusades began:
Muslims had conquered the Holy Land and restricted Christian pilgrimages.
Byzantine Emperor Alexios I asked the West for military help.
Pope Urban II at the Council of Clermont (1095) calls for a crusade to defend Christian territories and liberate Jerusalem.
The First Crusade (1096–1099) succeeded in recapturing Jerusalem.
St. Bernard of Clairvaux wrote:
"The knight of Christ may strike with confidence and die yet more confidently."
Real abuses:
Some Crusaders, though claiming to fight for God, committed grave sins:
Massacres of Jewish communities en route (condemned by Catholic leaders).
The Sack of Constantinople (1204, Fourth Crusade) — a betrayal of Christian unity.
Pope Innocent III excommunicated the Crusaders who attacked fellow Christians at Constantinople.
Catholic view today:
The goal of the Crusades was just and holy (defending the innocent, safeguarding pilgrimage, protecting Christendom).
Individual sins and corrupt motives by some participants were grave injustices.
12th–15th Centuries: Inquisitions
Purpose: To preserve orthodoxy in an age when religious dissent could tear societies apart.
Early Inquisition (1184): Mainly against Catharism (a dangerous dualistic heresy).
Spanish Inquisition (1478): Heavily politicized, especially against Jewish and Muslim converts suspected of false conversion.
Real abuses occurred, including:
Torture
False accusations
Political misuse
Modern Catholic understanding (per Catechism and Vatican II):
The faith must never be imposed by force.
"The truth cannot impose itself except by virtue of its own truth." (Dignitatis Humanae 1)
1378–1417 AD: The Western Schism
Multiple claimants to the papacy (Rome, Avignon, Pisa) cause scandal and confusion.
Resolved at the Council of Constance (1417), restoring unity.
1517 AD: The Protestant Reformation
Martin Luther posts 95 Theses criticizing abuses, especially around indulgences.
Many of Luther’s early critiques were legitimate (e.g., financial corruption), but he quickly rejected core Catholic doctrines:
The authority of the Pope
The Sacraments
The necessity of Tradition alongside Scripture
Council of Trent (1545–1563) responds:
Reaffirms Catholic teachings on grace, faith, sacraments, and Scripture.
Catholic view today:
The Church needed real reform (and carried it out at Trent).
Luther’s theological errors divided Christianity deeply and tragically.
1545–1563 AD: Council of Trent — Catholic Reformation
Deep reforms in clergy discipline, education (seminaries), and Church governance.
Clear doctrinal definitions (e.g., justification, Eucharist, Scripture and Tradition).
16th–18th Centuries: Global Catholic Missions
Evangelization spreads Catholicism worldwide:
Americas
Asia
Africa
Not all missionaries acted justly; some were complicit in colonial abuses.
Great saints like St. Francis Xavier and Bartolomé de las Casas fought for the dignity and rights of indigenous peoples.
1870 AD: First Vatican Council
Defines Papal Infallibility (only under very strict, rare conditions).
Suspended because of the Franco-Prussian War.
1917: Fatima Apparitions
Three shepherd children in Portugal report visions of the Virgin Mary calling for repentance, prayer, and consecration of Russia.
Officially approved by the Catholic Church.
1962–1965: Second Vatican Council (Vatican II)
Updates Catholic engagement with the modern world:
Liturgy reforms (Mass in vernacular languages)
Ecumenical outreach (recognizing seeds of truth outside Catholicism)
Religious freedom and dignity of conscience affirmed.
"The Church... is a sign and instrument of communion with God and of unity among all men." (Lumen Gentium 1)
2000: Great Jubilee and St. John Paul II's Apology
Pope John Paul II publicly asks forgiveness for the sins of Catholics over the centuries:
Crusades abuses
Inquisition excesses
Failure to protect Jews and minorities
2013: Election of Pope Francis
First Jesuit pope, first from the Americas.
Focus on mercy, the poor, evangelization.
2025 (Upcoming): Great Jubilee Year
Pope Francis has declared 2025 a Jubilee of Hope — a time of spiritual renewal.
Summary Points
Catholicism sees the Church as a divine institution with sinful members.
Crusades were just in purpose, though not free from human corruption.
Inquisitions had a legitimate aim (protecting faith and unity) but degenerated at times into injustice.
Protestant Reformation highlighted real clerical failings, but ultimately fragmented Christian unity.
The Church is ever-reforming (Ecclesia semper reformanda), remaining faithful to Christ’s promises that the gates of Hell would not prevail against her.
Sources Cited
Catechism of the Catholic Church (1992)
Council of Trent Documents
Second Vatican Council, Lumen Gentium, Dignitatis Humanae
Pope St. John Paul II, Tertio Millennio Adveniente (1994)
St. Bernard of Clairvaux, In Praise of the New Knighthood
Jaroslav Pelikan, The Christian Tradition
Philip Jenkins, The Jesus Wars, The Lost History of Christianity
Warren Carroll, The Glory of Christendom
Rodney Stark, God’s Battalions: The Case for the Crusades
2025: Death of Pope Francis and the Upcoming Conclave
I was deeply saddened by the news of Pope Francis's passing on Easter Monday, April 21, 2025. He died at the age of 88, from complications related to a stroke and heart failure. His papacy lasted 12 years and, whatever anyone’s opinions on some of his decisions, there’s no denying that he was a man deeply devoted to Christ, to Mary, and to the poor.
On April 26, the funeral Mass was held in St. Peter's Square. Over 250,000 people, including world leaders and countless faithful, gathered to pray for his soul. After the Mass, his casket was taken to the Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore — a fitting tribute, considering Pope Francis’s deep personal devotion to Our Lady.
Now, with the Chair of Peter vacant, the Church prepares for the next crucial step: the Conclave to elect a new pope. It’s set to begin on May 7, 2025, in the Sistine Chapel, and it will be the largest conclave in history, with 135 cardinal-electors — the majority of them appointed by Pope Francis himself.
There’s a lot of speculation about who might be elected. Some of the names coming up include:
Cardinal Pietro Parolin (Italy): The Vatican’s Secretary of State, a skilled diplomat with strong ties across the global Church.
Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle (Philippines): A pastoral, joyful figure who represents the growing Catholic population in Asia and carries on Francis’s focus on mercy and outreach.
Cardinal Fridolin Ambongo (Democratic Republic of Congo): A strong voice for social justice, environmental responsibility, and the vibrant African Church.
Whoever it will be, I pray the Holy Spirit guides the Cardinals to choose a man faithful to Christ, fearless in defending the truth, and strong in leading us in these chaotic times.
Just as Jesus promised: the gates of Hell will not prevail against His Church.
Sources Cited
Catechism of the Catholic Church (1992)
Council of Trent Documents
Second Vatican Council, Lumen Gentium, Dignitatis Humanae
Pope St. John Paul II, Tertio Millennio Adveniente (1994)
St. Bernard of Clairvaux, In Praise of the New Knighthood
Jaroslav Pelikan, The Christian Tradition
Philip Jenkins, The Jesus Wars, The Lost History of Christianity
Warren Carroll, The Glory of Christendom
Rodney Stark, God’s Battalions: The Case for the Crusades
Washington Post, Vatican prepares for conclave after Pope Francis' death (April 28, 2025)
AP News, Who might be the next pope? (April 27, 2025)
CBS News, Next Pope: Top contenders after Pope Francis (April 28, 2025)
Personal Reflection
I’m going to be honest: I didn’t always agree with everything Pope Francis said or did.
At times, I found his words confusing, vague, and hard to reconcile with the clarity I was used to in previous popes like St. John Paul II and Benedict XVI.
That said, I never stopped respecting him — as the Bishop of Rome, the Vicar of Christ, and my Holy Father.
He carried a heavy cross leading the Church in one of the most chaotic and hostile times in history, and I will always honor him for his faith, humility, and service.
As for the next Pope, my hope and prayer are simple:
I want a man who is clear, direct, and courageously traditional — but also charitable and wise in diplomacy.
A man who can stand before the world without apology and say, lovingly but unmistakably:
"I believe — without shame or compromise — that the Catholic Church is the One True Christian Church, founded by Jesus Christ Himself, and the One and Only sure way to God and salvation."
That’s not arrogance.
That’s just truth, spoken with love — the truth that Christ commanded His Church to proclaim to the ends of the earth (Matthew 28:19).
Whoever the next Pope will be, I pray he leads us with the boldness of Peter, the heart of John, and the wisdom of Benedict.
