Saturday, April 19, 2025

The Nazarenes, the Desposyni, and the Lost Jewish-Christian Church of Jerusalem

 

The Nazarenes, the Desposyni, and the Lost Jewish-Christian Church of Jerusalem




Introduction

When people think of early Christianity, they often picture Paul’s missionary journeys, the martyrdom of Peter and Paul in Rome, or the dramatic spread of the Gospel across the Greco-Roman world. But what often gets overlooked is that the earliest followers of Jesus were Jewish, and nowhere was this more visible than in the Jerusalem Church, led by those closest to Christ — including His own family.

In this post, we explore the role of the Nazarenes and the Desposyni — two vital groups of Jewish-Christians — in the earliest Church, their leadership in Jerusalem, and how they were ultimately exiled after the Bar Kokhba Revolt, making way for Gentile bishops and a new phase of Church history.


Who Were the Nazarenes?

The Nazarenes were early Jewish followers of Jesus who:

  • Accepted Him as the Messiah, Son of God, and risen Lord

  • Continued to observe TorahcircumcisionSabbath, and dietary laws

  • Acknowledged both Old and New Testaments

They were not heretical by early Church standards — unlike the Ebionites, who denied the divinity of Christ and rejected Paul.

St. Epiphanius described them this way:

“They use not only the New Testament but also the Old, as the Jews do... They have no different ideas, but confess everything exactly as the law proclaims it and in the Jewish fashion—except for their belief in Christ.”
— Panarion, 29.7

These Jewish-Christians formed the backbone of the original Jerusalem Church, closely connected to the Apostles.


Who Were the Desposyni?

The Desposyni (from the Greek despotes, "Lord") refers to Jesus’ blood relatives — particularly through His extended family. The term is applied to men like James the Just, called the “brother of the Lord” (Galatians 1:19), who became the first bishop of Jerusalem.

The Desposyni were:

  • Of the House of David, fulfilling messianic expectations

  • Recognized leaders in the early Church

  • Respected by both Jewish and Gentile believers

Eusebius of Caesarea, quoting the early Christian chronicler Hegesippus, wrote:

“After James the Just had suffered martyrdom... Simeon, the son of Clopas, was appointed the next bishop. He was a cousin of the Savior.”
— Ecclesiastical History, 4.22

The Desposyni provided stability, continuity, and a deeply Jewish expression of the Christian faith — one rooted in the Law, the Prophets, and the life of Jesus.


The First Fifteen Bishops of Jerusalem Were Jewish

Before the Roman exile of Jews from Jerusalem, the Church there was led by fifteen consecutive Jewish-Christian bishops. This list, preserved by Eusebius, includes:

  1. James the Just

  2. Simeon son of Clopas

  3. Justus

  4. Zacchaeus
    ... (and 11 others)

Eusebius wrote:

“Up to the siege of the Jews under Hadrian, there were fifteen bishops in succession, all of Hebrew origin, who received the knowledge of Christ in purity.”
— Ecclesiastical History, 4.5

These leaders likely came from or were closely connected to the Nazarenes and Desposyni, upholding Jewish-Christian identity in the Church’s most sacred city.


Exile After the Bar Kokhba Revolt (132–135 A.D.)

The Bar Kokhba Revolt was a massive Jewish uprising against Rome. After its brutal suppression, Emperor Hadrian took unprecedented measures:

  • Renamed Jerusalem as Aelia Capitolina

  • Built a temple to Jupiter over the Temple Mount

  • Erected statues of pagan gods and of himself

  • Banned Jews from entering Jerusalem, including Jewish-Christians

This effectively expelled the Nazarenes and Desposyni from their home city.

St. Epiphanius recorded:

“From the time of Hadrian until the reign of Constantine, the succession of bishops in Jerusalem was Gentile, for all the Jews were prohibited from entering the city.”
— Panarion, 29.7


The Bishopric Passes to Gentiles

With Jewish-Christians exiled, the Church in Jerusalem changed forever:

  • Marcus became the first Gentile bishop of Aelia (formerly Jerusalem)

  • The bishopric’s name and prestige were downgraded

  • It was placed under the authority of the Metropolitan of Caesarea

  • The Jerusalem Church lost its Jewish-Christian heritage

Though the Nazarenes and Desposyni likely continued to live and worship in surrounding areas like Pella, their influence on the central Church was diminished.

St. Jerome noted:

“Certain of the Desposyni, relatives of our Lord according to the flesh, survived until the time of Emperor Domitian.”
— On Illustrious Men, 2


The Legacy of the Nazarenes and Desposyni

The loss of Jewish-Christian leadership in Jerusalem marked a turning point in Church history. Over time, Christianity became increasingly Gentile in expression and leadership, and its Jewish roots faded from memory in many quarters.

Yet the Nazarenes and Desposyni:

  • Preserve the bridge between Judaism and Christianity

  • Remind us of the Church’s original context and heritage

  • Show that belief in Christ was not a betrayal of the Law, but its fulfillment (cf. Matthew 5:17)


Conclusion

The story of the Nazarenes and Desposyni is more than a footnote. It’s a forgotten chapter of the early Church that challenges us to remember our roots.

The Christian faith was not born in Rome or Athens, but in Jerusalem, nurtured by Jewish believers who followed Jesus as the promised Messiah. Their leadership, sacrifice, and exile laid the foundation for the worldwide Church, even if their names are too often forgotten.


📚 Sources & References

  • Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, Books 4 and 5

  • St. Epiphanius, Panarion, 29

  • St. Jerome, On Illustrious Men, 2

  • Robert Wilken, The Land Called Holy

  • Joan E. Taylor, Christians and the Holy Places

  • W.H.C. Frend, The Rise of Christianity

  • Galatians 1:19, Acts 15, Matthew 5:17

  • Epiphanius, Panarion

  • Hegesippus (as quoted in Eusebius)

Timeline: The Transformation of the Jerusalem Church (30 AD – 451 AD)


c. 30-33 AD
Crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus in Jerusalem. The early Christian movement begins among Jewish followers of Jesus.

c. 33 AD
James the Just, relative of Jesus, becomes the first Bishop of Jerusalem (Galatians 1:19).

33–100 AD
The Church in Jerusalem remains predominantly Jewish-Christian (Nazarenes and Desposyni). Leadership continues in the hands of Jesus' relatives and Jewish converts.

70 AD
Destruction of the Second Temple by the Romans. Many Christians flee Jerusalem to Pella in the Decapolis, preserving their faith and community.

c. 70–135 AD
Jerusalem Christians slowly return. Church led by a succession of 15 Jewish-Christian bishops, maintaining Jewish customs while proclaiming Christ.

132–135 AD
Bar Kokhba Revolt. Emperor Hadrian crushes the rebellion, bans all Jews from Jerusalem, and turns the city into a pagan colony: Aelia Capitolina.

135 AD
Hadrian builds a temple to Jupiter on the Temple Mount and places statues of pagan gods and possibly himself. Nazarenes and Desposyni are exiled with other Jews.

135–180 AD
Gentile bishops now lead the Church in Jerusalem (Aelia). Marcus becomes the first non-Jewish bishop.

313 AD
Edict of Milan. Christianity is legalized under Constantine the Great.

326–335 AD
St. Helena, Constantine's mother, visits the Holy Land. Constantine orders the destruction of pagan shrines and the construction of Christian churches, including the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.

325 AD
Council of Nicaea grants the Bishop of Aelia special honor but keeps him under Caesarea.

451 AD
Council of Chalcedon restores the prestige of Jerusalem, elevating the Bishop to Patriarch of Jerusalem and restoring the city’s Christian identity fully.

How Jerusalem Was Paganized by Hadrian and Reclaimed by Constantine: From Aelia Capitolina to the Holy City

 

How Jerusalem Was Paganized by Hadrian and Reclaimed by Constantine: From Aelia Capitolina to the Holy City






Introduction

Jerusalem has long stood at the crossroads of faith, empire, and power. But few periods in its history are as striking—and as often overlooked—as the time when it was turned into a pagan Roman city under Emperor Hadrian and then transformed into a Christian center by Constantine the Great.

This post explores how the Romans sought to erase Jerusalem’s Jewish and Christian identity, how early Christians were affected, and how the Church reclaimed the Holy City in the fourth century.


Part I: Hadrian’s Pagan Transformation — Aelia Capitolina

🔥 Aftermath of the Bar Kokhba Revolt (132–135 A.D.)

The Bar Kokhba Revolt was a major Jewish uprising against Roman rule. It ended with the destruction of much of Judea, the massacre of thousands, and the total banning of Jews from entering Jerusalem.

Cassius Dio, Roman historian:

“Fifty of their most important outposts and 985 of their best-known villages were razed to the ground. 580,000 men were slain in the various raids and battles... the whole of Judea became a desert.”
Roman History, Book 69

In the wake of the revolt, Emperor Hadrian (r. 117–138 A.D.) aimed to erase Jewish presence from the city completely.

🏛️ Renaming the City: Aelia Capitolina

Hadrian renamed Jerusalem Aelia CapitolinaAelia from his family name, Capitolina to honor Jupiter Capitolinus, the supreme Roman god. He sought not only to rename the city but to redefine its very identity.

  • Temple to Jupiter was built directly over the ruins of the Jewish Temple.

  • A statue of Jupiter was erected on the Temple Mount.

  • A statue of Hadrian himself was placed within the temple precincts.

  • A shrine to Aphrodite (Venus) was constructed over Golgotha, the traditional site of Jesus’ crucifixion and burial.

Eusebius of Caesarea, early Church historian:

“They erected a temple to the lifeless idols of the demons over the place of the resurrection.”
Demonstratio Evangelica, Book VI, ch. 18

🚫 Jews and Jewish-Christians Expelled

Hadrian issued a ban on all Jews entering Jerusalem, except on one day of the year (Tisha B’Av) to mourn the destruction of the Temple.

This also affected Jewish-Christians, who had long formed the backbone of the Jerusalem Church.

Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 4.5:

“The first fifteen bishops of Jerusalem were of Jewish origin, and were well-versed in the Hebrew language and scriptures.”

These bishops included figures like James the Just, referred to as "the brother of the Lord" (Galatians 1:19), who led the Church in Jerusalem in its earliest years (cf. Acts 15). These Jewish-Christian bishops maintained fidelity to Christ while honoring their Jewish heritage and customs.

After 135 A.D., that era came to an end.


Part II: The Rise of Gentile Leadership — Bishop of Aelia

With Jews expelled from the city, the Roman authorities allowed only Gentile Christians to remain. Thus began a new phase of the Jerusalem Church.

  • The bishopric was transferred from Jewish to Gentile leadership.

  • The bishop was no longer known as “Bishop of Jerusalem”, but “Bishop of Aelia.”

  • The Church’s prestige in the city declined significantly.

St. Epiphanius of Salamis (4th century):

“From the time of Hadrian until the reign of Constantine, the succession of bishops in Jerusalem was Gentile, for all the Jews were prohibited from entering the city.”
Panarion, 29.7

The Church of Jerusalem lost its earlier influence and was administratively placed under the Metropolitan of Caesarea, per the Council of Nicaea (325 A.D.).


Part III: Constantine and the Christian Rebirth of Jerusalem



🕊️ Constantine Legalizes Christianity

With the Edict of Milan in 313 A.D., Emperor Constantine and Licinius legalized Christianity throughout the empire. Constantine soon turned his attention to Jerusalem — not as a political capital, but as the spiritual heart of Christianity.

👑 St. Helena’s Pilgrimage

In 326 A.D., Constantine’s mother, St. Helena, undertook a pilgrimage to the Holy Land. Guided by local Christians, she identified key sites associated with Christ’s passion, death, and resurrection.

St. Ambrose, writing about Helena:

“She sought the footprints of the Lord and found the places of His passion and resurrection. She adorned them with splendid churches.”
On the Death of Theodosius, 46

🛕 Destruction of Pagan Shrines and Christian Churches Built

Constantine ordered the destruction of Hadrian’s pagan temples and initiated a large-scale Christian building project:

  1. Church of the Holy Sepulchre (335 A.D.)

    • Built over Golgotha and the tomb of Christ, previously buried under Hadrian’s shrine to Venus.

    • Eusebius records the dramatic uncovering of Christ’s tomb during excavation.

    “The cave of the Savior was discovered, and the holy sepulchre revealed... the emperor ordered a magnificent house of prayer to be raised.”
    Life of Constantine, Book 3, ch. 28–30

  2. Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem

  3. Eleona Church on the Mount of Olives

  4. Church of the Ascension (later rebuilt by Christians)

Socrates Scholasticus, 5th-century Church historian:

“The emperor directed the bishop Macarius to erect a church on the site where the Savior had been buried... having razed to the ground the idol-temples.”
Ecclesiastical History, Book 1, ch. 17


Part IV: Restoration of the Bishopric of Jerusalem

Jerusalem’s ecclesiastical status began to be restored in the fourth and fifth centuries:

  • Council of Nicaea (325) granted the bishop of Aelia a position of honor but still subordinate to Caesarea (Canon 7).

  • Council of Chalcedon (451) officially elevated Jerusalem to a patriarchate, recognizing its ancient roots and spiritual significance.


Conclusion: From Desecration to Resurrection

Hadrian tried to erase Jerusalem’s religious identity by turning it into a pagan Roman colony, banning Jews and Jewish-Christians, and erecting temples to false gods over holy places.

But two centuries later, Constantine reversed the desecration. With Helena’s help, the Church reclaimed the sacred geography of salvation history — not with weapons, but with faith, memory, and stone.

The transformation from Aelia Capitolina to Christian Jerusalem wasn’t just political. It was theological. The city that once rejected Christ was now being rebuilt in His name — and would remain the heart of Christian pilgrimage for the next 1,700 years.


📚 References & Further Reading

Primary Sources

  • Eusebius of Caesarea, Ecclesiastical History, Life of Constantine, Demonstratio Evangelica

  • Cassius Dio, Roman History, Book 69

  • St. Epiphanius, Panarion

  • St. Ambrose, On the Death of Theodosius

  • Socrates Scholasticus, Ecclesiastical History

Secondary Sources

  • Robert Louis Wilken, The Land Called Holy

  • Joan E. Taylor, Christians and the Holy Places

  • W.H.C. Frend, The Rise of Christianity

  • Jerome Murphy-O’Connor, The Holy Land: An Oxford Archaeological Guide

  • Catechism of the Catholic Church §638–640

🏛️ Aelia Capitolina and the Temple Mount: A Pagan Outrage with Apocalyptic Echoes

Among the most provocative acts carried out by Emperor Hadrian was the erection of pagan shrines and statues on the Temple Mount, the holiest site in Judaism and a place with deep theological significance to early Christians. This wasn’t merely a religious insult—it may have shaped how early Christians read the Book of Revelation and the writings of St. Paul about the end times.

🔺 The Temple Mount Desecrated

  • Hadrian built a temple to Jupiter directly over the ruins of the Jewish Temple.

  • A statue of Jupiter and likely a statue of Hadrian himself were erected on the site.

  • This act was widely understood as a desecration of what had been the earthly dwelling place of the God of Israel.

Cassius Dio (Roman History, Book 69.12): “He founded a city called Aelia Capitolina on the site of Jerusalem, and built a temple to Jupiter where the Jewish temple had stood.”

Eusebius of Caesarea, Demonstratio Evangelica VI.18: “They planted idols upon the holy place, and built a temple to their own god [Jupiter] upon the ruins of the one God’s sanctuary.”

This dramatic replacement of the worship of God with the worship of man and idols would have reminded early Christians of vivid apocalyptic warnings.


🔥 Was This Seen as a Fulfillment of Prophecy?

📖 2 Thessalonians 2:3–4 – The Man of Lawlessness

“Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, who opposes and exalts himself against every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God.”
2 Thessalonians 2:3–4

This prophecy, often interpreted by the Church Fathers as referring to the Antichrist, directly mentions someone standing in the temple of God and claiming divine status. For early Christians, Hadrian’s actions — especially the statue of himself in the Temple precinct — would have seemed alarmingly close to this description.

📖 Revelation 11:1–2 – The Outer Court Trampled by Gentiles

*“Rise and measure the temple of God and the altar and those who worship there, but do not measure the court outside the temple; leave that out, for it is given over to the nations, and they will *trample the holy city for forty-two months.”
Revelation 11:1–2

The phrase “trample the holy city” by “the nations” (i.e., Gentiles) fits the image of Roman soldiers and architects rebuilding Jerusalem as a pagan city, with shrines to false gods and imperial idols.

St. Jerome, writing in the 4th century: “Hadrian profaned the holy places with idols... setting up statues of Jupiter and himself on the site of the Temple.”
Commentary on Matthew 24


🏺 Echoes of the "Abomination of Desolation"

Jesus Himself referred to “the abomination of desolation” (cf. Matthew 24:15), a phrase originally from Daniel 9:27, which early Christians believed pointed to both the destruction of the Temple and the defilement of sacred space.

“So when you see the abomination of desolation spoken of by the prophet Daniel, standing in the holy place...”
Matthew 24:15

Hadrian’s act of putting pagan idols in the Temple area was seen by many Christians as a fulfillment or foreshadowing of that prophecy.

Origen, early Christian theologian (c. 185–253 A.D.), writes: “The prophecy concerning the abomination of desolation was fulfilled when the Temple was profaned by the Romans... and again when the image of the emperor was set up in the holy place.”
Against Celsus, Book VI


🧩 Conclusion: A Political Act with Theological Impact

Hadrian’s transformation of Jerusalem into Aelia Capitolina and the desecration of the Temple Mount weren’t just political — they were spiritual provocations. For the early Church, these acts were read through the lens of Scripture: not merely as anti-Jewish persecution, but as signs that resonated with the apocalyptic vision of Paul, Revelation, Daniel, and Christ Himself.

It is no surprise that, for centuries, Christians remembered Hadrian’s pagan city not just as a historical footnote — but as a symbol of the Antichrist’s rebellion, a warning of what happens when man tries to replace God with himself.


📚 Expanded References & Sources

Scripture:

  • Daniel 9:27

  • Matthew 24:15

  • 2 Thessalonians 2:3–4

  • Revelation 11:1–2

Ancient Sources:

  • Cassius Dio, Roman History

  • Eusebius of Caesarea, Demonstratio Evangelica, Life of Constantine

  • St. Jerome, Commentary on Matthew

  • Origen, Against Celsus

  • St. Epiphanius, Panarion

Modern Historians:

  • Robert Louis Wilken, The Land Called Holy

  • Joan E. Taylor, Christians and the Holy Places

  • W.H.C. Frend, The Rise of Christianity

  • Jerome Murphy-O’Connor, The Holy Land: An Oxford Archaeological Guide

The Nazarenes, the Desposyni, and the Lost Jewish-Christian Church of Jerusalem




Introduction

When people think of early Christianity, they often picture Paul’s missionary journeys, the martyrdom of Peter and Paul in Rome, or the dramatic spread of the Gospel across the Greco-Roman world. But what often gets overlooked is that the earliest followers of Jesus were Jewish, and nowhere was this more visible than in the Jerusalem Church, led by those closest to Christ — including His own family.

In this post, we explore the role of the Nazarenes and the Desposyni — two vital groups of Jewish-Christians — in the earliest Church, their leadership in Jerusalem, and how they were ultimately exiled after the Bar Kokhba Revolt, making way for Gentile bishops and a new phase of Church history.


Who Were the Nazarenes?

The Nazarenes were early Jewish followers of Jesus who:

  • Accepted Him as the Messiah, Son of God, and risen Lord

  • Continued to observe Torah, circumcision, Sabbath, and dietary laws

  • Acknowledged both Old and New Testaments

They were not heretical by early Church standards — unlike the Ebionites, who denied the divinity of Christ and rejected Paul.

St. Epiphanius described them this way:

“They use not only the New Testament but also the Old, as the Jews do... They have no different ideas, but confess everything exactly as the law proclaims it and in the Jewish fashion—except for their belief in Christ.”
Panarion, 29.7

These Jewish-Christians formed the backbone of the original Jerusalem Church, closely connected to the Apostles.


Who Were the Desposyni?

The Desposyni (from the Greek despotes, "Lord") refers to Jesus’ blood relatives — particularly through His extended family. The term is applied to men like James the Just, called the “brother of the Lord” (Galatians 1:19), who became the first bishop of Jerusalem.

The Desposyni were:

  • Of the House of David, fulfilling messianic expectations

  • Recognized leaders in the early Church

  • Respected by both Jewish and Gentile believers

Eusebius of Caesarea, quoting the early Christian chronicler Hegesippus, wrote:

“After James the Just had suffered martyrdom... Simeon, the son of Clopas, was appointed the next bishop. He was a cousin of the Savior.”
Ecclesiastical History, 4.22

The Desposyni provided stability, continuity, and a deeply Jewish expression of the Christian faith — one rooted in the Law, the Prophets, and the life of Jesus.


The First Fifteen Bishops of Jerusalem Were Jewish

Before the Roman exile of Jews from Jerusalem, the Church there was led by fifteen consecutive Jewish-Christian bishops. This list, preserved by Eusebius, includes:

  1. James the Just

  2. Simeon son of Clopas

  3. Justus

  4. Zacchaeus
    ... (and 11 others)

Eusebius wrote:

“Up to the siege of the Jews under Hadrian, there were fifteen bishops in succession, all of Hebrew origin, who received the knowledge of Christ in purity.”
Ecclesiastical History, 4.5

These leaders likely came from or were closely connected to the Nazarenes and Desposyni, upholding Jewish-Christian identity in the Church’s most sacred city.


Exile After the Bar Kokhba Revolt (132–135 A.D.)

The Bar Kokhba Revolt was a massive Jewish uprising against Rome. After its brutal suppression, Emperor Hadrian took unprecedented measures:

  • Renamed Jerusalem as Aelia Capitolina

  • Built a temple to Jupiter over the Temple Mount

  • Erected statues of pagan gods and of himself

  • Banned Jews from entering Jerusalem, including Jewish-Christians

This effectively expelled the Nazarenes and Desposyni from their home city.

St. Epiphanius recorded:

“From the time of Hadrian until the reign of Constantine, the succession of bishops in Jerusalem was Gentile, for all the Jews were prohibited from entering the city.”
Panarion, 29.7


The Bishopric Passes to Gentiles

With Jewish-Christians exiled, the Church in Jerusalem changed forever:

  • Marcus became the first Gentile bishop of Aelia (formerly Jerusalem)

  • The bishopric’s name and prestige were downgraded

  • It was placed under the authority of the Metropolitan of Caesarea

  • The Jerusalem Church lost its Jewish-Christian heritage

Though the Nazarenes and Desposyni likely continued to live and worship in surrounding areas like Pella, their influence on the central Church was diminished.

St. Jerome noted:

“Certain of the Desposyni, relatives of our Lord according to the flesh, survived until the time of Emperor Domitian.”
On Illustrious Men, 2


The Legacy of the Nazarenes and Desposyni

The loss of Jewish-Christian leadership in Jerusalem marked a turning point in Church history. Over time, Christianity became increasingly Gentile in expression and leadership, and its Jewish roots faded from memory in many quarters.

Yet the Nazarenes and Desposyni:

  • Preserve the bridge between Judaism and Christianity

  • Remind us of the Church’s original context and heritage

  • Show that belief in Christ was not a betrayal of the Law, but its fulfillment (cf. Matthew 5:17)


Conclusion

The story of the Nazarenes and Desposyni is more than a footnote. It’s a forgotten chapter of the early Church that challenges us to remember our roots.

The Christian faith was not born in Rome or Athens, but in Jerusalem, nurtured by Jewish believers who followed Jesus as the promised Messiah. Their leadership, sacrifice, and exile laid the foundation for the worldwide Church, even if their names are too often forgotten.


📚 Sources & References

  • Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, Books 4 and 5

  • St. Epiphanius, Panarion, 29

  • St. Jerome, On Illustrious Men, 2

  • Robert Wilken, The Land Called Holy

  • Joan E. Taylor, Christians and the Holy Places

  • W.H.C. Frend, The Rise of Christianity

  • Galatians 1:19, Acts 15, Matthew 5:17

  • Epiphanius, Panarion

  • Hegesippus (as quoted in Eusebius)

Timeline: The Transformation of the Jerusalem Church (30 AD – 451 AD)


c. 30-33 AD
Crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus in Jerusalem. The early Christian movement begins among Jewish followers of Jesus.

c. 33 AD
James the Just, relative of Jesus, becomes the first Bishop of Jerusalem (Galatians 1:19).

33–100 AD
The Church in Jerusalem remains predominantly Jewish-Christian (Nazarenes and Desposyni). Leadership continues in the hands of Jesus' relatives and Jewish converts.

70 AD
Destruction of the Second Temple by the Romans. Many Christians flee Jerusalem to Pella in the Decapolis, preserving their faith and community.

c. 70–135 AD
Jerusalem Christians slowly return. Church led by a succession of 15 Jewish-Christian bishops, maintaining Jewish customs while proclaiming Christ.

132–135 AD
Bar Kokhba Revolt. Emperor Hadrian crushes the rebellion, bans all Jews from Jerusalem, and turns the city into a pagan colony: Aelia Capitolina.

135 AD
Hadrian builds a temple to Jupiter on the Temple Mount and places statues of pagan gods and possibly himself. Nazarenes and Desposyni are exiled with other Jews.

135–180 AD
Gentile bishops now lead the Church in Jerusalem (Aelia). Marcus becomes the first non-Jewish bishop.

313 AD
Edict of Milan. Christianity is legalized under Constantine the Great.

326–335 AD
St. Helena, Constantine's mother, visits the Holy Land. Constantine orders the destruction of pagan shrines and the construction of Christian churches, including the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.

325 AD
Council of Nicaea grants the Bishop of Aelia special honor but keeps him under Caesarea.

451 AD
Council of Chalcedon restores the prestige of Jerusalem, elevating the Bishop to Patriarch of Jerusalem and restoring the city’s Christian identity fully.

Easter is Pagan!

 The claim that Easter is pagan often revolves around the names and dates associated with the celebration, specifically the association with the pagan goddess Eostre or the Mesopotamian goddess Ishtar. To understand whether Easter is pagan, it’s essential to examine the origins of the celebration and the alleged connections to these deities.

The Origins of Easter



Easter, in Christian tradition, is the celebration of the resurrection of Jesus Christ, a central event in Christianity. The timing of Easter is linked to the Jewish festival of Passover, which commemorates the Exodus from Egypt and often overlaps with the Christian celebration. The New Testament describes how Jesus was crucified during Passover, and His resurrection is celebrated on the Sunday following Passover (Matthew 26-28, Mark 14-16, Luke 22-24, John 18-20).

The term "Easter" itself is derived from the Old English word Ēastre or Ēostre, which was mentioned by the Anglo-Saxon monk Bede in the 8th century. Bede noted that Ēosturmonath (April) was named after a goddess named Eostre, who was associated with spring and fertility. However, there is limited evidence outside of Bede’s writings about the worship of Eostre, and it’s unclear how widespread her veneration was.

The Goddess Eostre



Eostre, or Ostara, is a purported Anglo-Saxon goddess of spring and dawn. According to Bede’s De Temporum Ratione, she was honored in a festival during the month of April, and it is from this name that the term "Easter" is believed to have been derived in English-speaking countries. However, outside of Bede's account, there is no substantial historical evidence of Eostre’s worship, leading some scholars to speculate that Bede might have extrapolated or misinterpreted the connection.

The Goddess Ishtar



Ishtar is a Mesopotamian goddess associated with love, war, and fertility. She is one of the most significant deities in the Mesopotamian pantheon. Some modern claims assert that Easter derives from Ishtar, due to the phonetic similarity between "Easter" and "Ishtar." However, this connection is not supported by historical evidence. The word "Easter" is not derived from "Ishtar"; rather, it comes from the Old English Ēastre. Furthermore, the themes and rituals of Easter have no direct connection to Ishtar’s worship, which was focused on entirely different concepts.

Christianization and Adaptation

While it’s true that early Christians sometimes adapted existing pagan festivals when introducing Christianity to new regions, the core of Easter—the resurrection of Christ—remains distinctly Christian. The use of symbols like eggs and rabbits, which are associated with fertility and spring, may have been integrated into Easter celebrations over time, but these are cultural additions rather than indicators that Easter itself is pagan.

Conclusion

The idea that Easter is pagan because of its association with Eostre or Ishtar is based on superficial similarities rather than historical evidence. The Christian celebration of Easter is firmly rooted in the resurrection of Jesus, a historical and theological event that predates any alleged connections to pagan festivals. While the name "Easter" may have been influenced by a local goddess in certain regions, the celebration’s content and meaning are thoroughly Christian.

Sources

  • Bede, De Temporum Ratione.
  • McDougall, Sara. Easter: Myth, Religion, and Tradition. Cambridge University Press, 2019.
  • Hutton, Ronald. The Stations of the Sun: A History of the Ritual Year in Britain. Oxford University Press, 1996.
  • Leithart, Peter J. Deep Comedy: Trinity, Tragedy, and Hope in Western Literature. Canon Press, 2006.

The Official Name of Easter: Pascha (Passover)

While the term "Easter" is commonly used in English-speaking countries, the official name of the celebration in the Christian liturgical calendar remains Pascha, which is derived from the Hebrew word Pesach, meaning Passover. This reflects the historical and theological connection between the Jewish Passover and the Christian celebration of Jesus' resurrection. In most languages, the name for Easter is still closely related to "Pascha," emphasizing its roots in the Passover feast. The early Christians saw Christ’s death and resurrection as the fulfillment of the Passover, with Jesus being the new Passover lamb who delivers humanity from the bondage of sin.

The Council of Nicaea and the Change of Date



The date of Easter was a significant issue in the early Church, as different Christian communities celebrated it on different dates. Some followed the Jewish calendar, celebrating Easter on the 14th of Nisan (the date of Passover), regardless of the day of the week, while others celebrated it on the following Sunday. This difference led to disputes and confusion.

To address this, the First Council of Nicaea, convened by Emperor Constantine in 325 AD, sought to establish a uniform date for the celebration of Easter. The Council decided that Easter should be celebrated on the first Sunday after the first full moon following the vernal equinox. This decision meant that Easter would no longer be directly tied to the Jewish Passover but would still maintain a connection to the lunar calendar. The goal was to ensure that all Christians would celebrate Easter on the same day, emphasizing unity within the Church.

Constantine’s Influence: Constantine’s motivations for standardizing the date of Easter were both theological and political. He wanted to separate Christian practices from Jewish customs, as indicated by his letter to the bishops after the Council, where he emphasized the importance of distinguishing the Christian celebration from Jewish Passover practices. Constantine wrote, “We ought not to have anything in common with the Jews, for the Savior has shown us another way… it is our duty not to have anything in common with the murderers of our Lord” (Eusebius, Life of Constantine, Book III, Chapter 18).

The decision at Nicaea to set Easter on a Sunday was also aimed at reinforcing the significance of Sunday as the day of the Lord’s resurrection, distancing Christian practices from Jewish traditions, and promoting a unified Christian identity.

Conclusion

The claim that Easter is pagan is not supported by historical evidence. The celebration of Easter, or Pascha, is rooted in the Jewish Passover and the Christian belief in the resurrection of Jesus. While cultural elements, such as the name "Easter" in English, may have some connections to pre-Christian traditions, the core of the celebration is distinctly Christian. The decision to change the date of Easter at the Council of Nicaea was made to unify the Church and to ensure that the celebration of Christ's resurrection would be observed consistently across all Christian communities.

Sources:

  • Bede, De Temporum Ratione.
  • Eusebius, Life of Constantine, Book III, Chapter 18.
  • Council of Nicaea, Canon 1.
  • Hutton, Ronald. The Stations of the Sun: A History of the Ritual Year in Britain. Oxford University Press, 1996.
  • McGowan, Andrew. Ancient Christian Worship: Early Church Practices in Social, Historical, and Theological Perspective. Baker Academic, 2014.

Wednesday, April 16, 2025

Using AI Like ChatGPT Ethically: A Behind-the-Scenes Look at My Creative Process

 


Using AI Like ChatGPT Ethically: A Behind-the-Scenes Look at My Creative Process

In the spirit of transparency, I want to share something about how I create the content you read here. I use AI — specifically ChatGPT — as a ghostwriter, editor, and research assistant.

That might raise eyebrows, but hear me out.

🧠 The Ideas Are Mine

Everything starts with my ideas, opinions, questions, and often rough drafts. I use ChatGPT to help shape them — whether that’s polishing the grammar, structuring my points more clearly, or tightening the tone. Think of it like having a very fast, very smart assistant who helps me write the way I want to write, but better.

🧰 How I Use AI

  • I feed ChatGPT specific prompts I create based on my thoughts.

  • I carefully review and edit what it generates.

  • fact-check any claims or sources it references.

  • I only use outputs that reflect my values, voice, and message.

So, while the final wording isn’t always typed by my fingers, it absolutely reflects my perspective. I stay in control of the message.

🤔 But Is It Ethical to Use AI as a Ghostwriter or Editor?

This is a fair question, and one worth asking in this new era of digital creativity.

My short answer: Yes — when you use it responsibly and transparently.

Here’s what that looks like:

  • You originate the ideas and content direction.

  • You don’t mislead people into thinking every word is purely yours if it isn’t.

  • You verify information and take ownership of the message.

  • You treat AI as a tool, not a replacement for your own thinking.

Writers use editors. Journalists have fact-checkers. Businesspeople use consultants. I use AI in a similar way — to elevate my voice, not replace it.

As AI becomes a normal part of content creation, it’s not about whether you use it, but how you use it.

And I choose to use it openly, ethically, and with intention.


📌 FAQ: Using AI Like ChatGPT in My Creative Work

Q: Do you write your content yourself or does AI do it for you?
A: The ideas, prompts, and direction are all mine. I use AI to help with editing, phrasing, and structure — but I guide the process and review everything before sharing it.

Q: Isn’t that the same as having someone else write for you?
A: It’s more like working with an editor or assistant. The thoughts are mine — AI helps express them more effectively. I always verify and shape the final message.

Q: Are the sources you use accurate if they come from AI?
A: I never rely on AI-generated information without checking it. I cross-reference all sources, facts, and citations to make sure they’re credible and accurate.

Q: Why not just write everything manually?
A: I could — and often do. But AI saves time, helps with clarity, and enhances creativity. It’s a tool, not a shortcut.

Q: Is this ethical? Shouldn’t people disclose when they use AI?
A: Yes, and that’s why I’m being upfront about it. I believe in transparency and ownership. When used with integrity, AI is no different than any other tool that supports creative work.